Posts: 2,160 Location: New Hampshire
Sat 02 Apr, 2005 3:42 pm
English Basket Hilt Cavalry Sword, circa 1580 to 1610
Posts: 2,160 Location: New Hampshire
Sat 02 Apr, 2005 6:39 pm
Hmmm .........

Posts: 1,001 Location: Roanoke,Va
Sat 02 Apr, 2005 7:43 pm
That's a pretty sight. Thanks for posting the pics Mac. And your "hmmmm" is right on target as well.
Cheers,
Bill
Posts: 4,393 Location: Northern California
Sun 03 Apr, 2005 9:59 am
Yes, I also noticed the resemblence to Eljay's design, though, of course there are some significant differences, IMHO all in favor of the replica. I wonder what Eljay's hilt will look like in 400 years?
I wish Ken Drake had listed the blade length and overall weight.. That sword looks like it is pretty light.
Posts: 2,160 Location: New Hampshire
Sun 03 Apr, 2005 5:41 pm
Roger Hooper wrote: |
Yes, I also noticed the resemblence to Eljay's design, though, of course there are some significant differences, IMHO all in favor of the replica. I wonder what Eljay's hilt will look like in 400 years?
I wish Ken Drake had listed the blade length and overall weight.. That sword looks like it is pretty light. |
Is it just me .... or does this hilt have a fairly modern look to it ?
Maybe it's just the photo's, or my old eyes, but its steel seems to lack that nice old pitted & porous look that one would expect on a sword of this period ? Maybe it's been cleaned, patina long gone, but you'd think it would at least match the wear of the blade?
Some of its guard elements also seem a little thin where a lap weld would thicken them ?
I'd have to guess the grip is a replacement, too( which is quite common on old swords) , as it's in very good shape !
I dunno ..... this is just my opinion, and certainly could be in error, ?, but my Spider-sense is tingling ? ! !
I'd luv to see a closeup/high-rez shot of the hilt .... maybe that would clear up my doubts ?
Regardless, it is a very nice sword !
Other thoughts ? , Mac
* Please know that I am not calling anything, or anyone, into question here, as it's hard to be certain when judging things from pictures on the internet ? This is just a good opportunity to discuss what we each see when trying to determine age on these things ! So smile, Big smile :-)
Last edited by Thomas McDonald on Sun 03 Apr, 2005 8:04 pm; edited 1 time in total
Posts: 2,160 Location: New Hampshire
Sun 03 Apr, 2005 7:14 pm
* Comparison *
On the left is a hilt by Eljay Erickson that was made approximately 8 years ago, c. 1997-98 .
Mac
Attachment: 29.41 KB

Posts: 455 Location: Thailand
Mon 04 Apr, 2005 4:47 am
Hmmm... hey! Why are we all humming? Don't we know the words? Enough bad jokes. As far as I can tell, that's not one of mine. However, I do think we're looking at a composite sword, for the reasons mentioned above.
Now what I was hmm..ing about was that I did make one of these for Jim Perry back in the early 90s, and I don't think that it showed up when his collection was dispersed after his death. Anyone know where it is?
--ElJay
Posts: 356 Location: Roanoke, Virginia
Mon 04 Apr, 2005 2:38 pm
I'm no expert on this type of hilt, so I really do mean this as a question...
Do the screw heads seem a little modern as well? Comparing them to the limited number of photos I have of other swords of the same period, the heads seem a bit thin and rounded.
Mac or ElJay -- can you shed any light this? Does this observation seem valid, or are the screw heads consistent with other examples you have seen?
--Chris
Posts: 1,001 Location: Roanoke,Va
Mon 04 Apr, 2005 3:33 pm
Chris,
I'm not Eljay or Mac,but your observation does have a valid aim. The srews do have a "machined" look to them as the slots look cleanly fashioned. It could possibly be that they were just replaced at some point.
Bill
You
cannot post new topics in this forum
You
cannot reply to topics in this forum
You
cannot edit your posts in this forum
You
cannot delete your posts in this forum
You
cannot vote in polls in this forum
You
cannot attach files in this forum
You
can download files in this forum