Hello everyone
Hoping you can help me on the question of how armour was transported when not being worn.
Many armoured infantrymen (especially the Landsknechts who are my main focus of interest, but others too) would only wear their armour when combat was reasonably imminent. Assuming something like the half harness plus helmet of a well equipped late mediaeval/early modern foot soldier:
How did they package and transport it on the march? I’m assuming it would go on transport wagons when decent roads were available - how would they pack or wrap it? Could it be packaged to fit on pack horses or mules and, if so, does anyone know how?
If no wagons or pack animals were available, was it easier to wear your armour or carry it, and if the latter how would they pack it?
Any help with these logistical questions, which seem to get a bit neglected as unglamorous in much literature and film, would be much appreciated :)
Thanks!
It's a good question! I know there are accounts of medieval knights' armor being packed in chests or boxes, but not sure what there is for common infantry. There *must* be some revealing woodcuts or other illustrations, considering the sheer mass of artwork that survives! I just don't have the resources.
Boxes seems a little bulky for (for example) your typical Landsknecht force, but they'd certainly protect from the elements better than bags or baskets.
I will say that if you have to lug it yourself, WEAR IT. That's hugely easier than trying to schlep it on your back. And it's a big reason why you rarely see common infantry with no leg armor--you do NOT want to march 10 miles in greaves...
Looking forward to better answers!
Matthew
Boxes seems a little bulky for (for example) your typical Landsknecht force, but they'd certainly protect from the elements better than bags or baskets.
I will say that if you have to lug it yourself, WEAR IT. That's hugely easier than trying to schlep it on your back. And it's a big reason why you rarely see common infantry with no leg armor--you do NOT want to march 10 miles in greaves...
Looking forward to better answers!
Matthew
Matthew Amt wrote: |
Boxes seems a little bulky for (for example) your typical Landsknecht force, but they'd certainly protect from the elements better than bags or baskets. |
Indeed. If you take a paper-standard Landsknecht regiment of 4 thousand men, even if only a quarter of those men are armoured then that’s a thousand sets of armour that have to be found space in the baggage train, in addition to rations, ammunition, equipment and everything else. Unless the footman’s half harness is designed to interlock and save space in packing (which I doubt), that must surely take up a huge amount of space in wagons…?
Any re-enactors around here care to share how much transport space their armour takes up and how they pack it?
That is a good question. That is an advantage mail has over plate. I think that in some cases it might have been easier to wear the armour than carry it. Specifically with Landsknechts, Troßfrauen are often depicted carrying what appears to be heavy luggage. Sometimes there are boys depicted following Landsknechts. Landsknechts with plate armour were often from the nobility or from "gutem Haus", and probably had some kind of servant. This would explain part of what their extra pay was for. I wonder if they had pack animals? I have seen at least two pictures of boys with dead chickens. I wonder if this is symbolic. Most Landsknecht woodcuts contain symbolism as well as a moral message.
[ Linked Image ]
https://www.rijksmuseum.nl/nl/collectie/RP-P-OB-54.785
[ Linked Image ]
https://www.rijksmuseum.nl/nl/collectie/RP-P-OB-54.785
It is interesting that while there are lots of images of women loaded down with baggage, I'm not sure I know one with the woman carrying armour. Male children with helmets occassionally. Is this artistic convention (armour being symbolic of the soldier, domestic equipment of women)? Or an actual practice (a soldier carried his own armour but piled everything else on the long suffering Troßfrauen)?
Anthony Clipsom wrote: |
It is interesting that while there are lots of images of women loaded down with baggage, I'm not sure I know one with the woman carrying armour. Male children with helmets occassionally. Is this artistic convention (armour being symbolic of the soldier, domestic equipment of women)? Or an actual practice (a soldier carried his own armour but piled everything else on the long suffering Troßfrauen)? |
It makes some sense to wear the armor on the march but hand the helmet off to a servant--you certainly don't want to *wear* it on the march!
I'm wondering if the soldiers were able to load their own baggage on the army's wagons and pack animals, but women were not permitted to, perhaps? So they were on their own to carry their own stuff if they wanted to tag along. Don't know! In the late 18th century, a certain number of women were actually carried on the unit's rosters, and provided half-rations, so they were *official* camp followers. No idea if there was a similar concept in the 16th century.
Matthew
Page 1 of 1
You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum