I took delivery of this beautiful beast earlier this week. It's one of Tod's custom Wallace Collection Rondel Daggers (as opposed to the Tod Cutler version). I have always loved this dagger, but hadn't fully appreciated how complex it is until Tod did his 3-video series on it (go watch them if you haven't!).
Here are some quick pics. I'll post more thoughts later and will do a full review at some point. First impressions: what a great piece that captures all the details of a very unique original. :)
Attachment: 77.66 KB
Attachment: 59.36 KB
Attachment: 72.65 KB
Attachment: 67.41 KB
That's nice!
VERY lovely
its also kinda insane how LONG it is.
its also kinda insane how LONG it is.
What’s crazy to me is that the blade is over 1/2 an inch thick at the base. That’s nuts. :).
Over .5”? Mine is only 3/8. Now I’m sad.😢
Seriously though of my 4 rondels from Tod’s Workshop or Tod’s Stuff the Wallace is the one I’d pick for a serious fight.
Seriously though of my 4 rondels from Tod’s Workshop or Tod’s Stuff the Wallace is the one I’d pick for a serious fight.
Lloyd Winter wrote: |
Over .5”? Mine is only 3/8. Now I’m sad.😢 |
Yep, about .52 inches or just over 13mm. Is yours a Tod Cutler version or the Tod's Workshop version?
Quote: |
Seriously though of my 4 rondels from Tod’s Workshop or Tod’s Stuff the Wallace is the one I’d pick for a serious fight. |
This thing is definitely not a genteel indoor costume accessory weapon. :)
Mine is from Tod’s Workshop.
I think that mine was the model for the pics on the web site.
I think that mine was the model for the pics on the web site.
Thanks Chad and glad you love it and Lloyd glad you love your skinny one too.
The correct thickness is just over 13mm which is a crazy thick blade and not sure why yours should be that much thinner Lloyd. My guess would be that I made it for stock and had a piece of 10mm that was a suitable size and used that and if it is a stock item then I don't mind changing some dimensions. So I will make the assumption it was not a custom order and if it was I have no idea what happened, whoever at 10mm I am still pretty sure it will be robust.
I have always loved this dagger for a few reasons and its sheer unapologetic size in length and thickness has to be a large part of that.
Enjoy!
Tod
The correct thickness is just over 13mm which is a crazy thick blade and not sure why yours should be that much thinner Lloyd. My guess would be that I made it for stock and had a piece of 10mm that was a suitable size and used that and if it is a stock item then I don't mind changing some dimensions. So I will make the assumption it was not a custom order and if it was I have no idea what happened, whoever at 10mm I am still pretty sure it will be robust.
I have always loved this dagger for a few reasons and its sheer unapologetic size in length and thickness has to be a large part of that.
Enjoy!
Tod
It was custom but no worries, it was more than 5 years ago as I recall. It’s not like I ever held it in my hand and said this isn’t beefy enough.
Nice pick up Chad! I like that a lot.
Just for fun, here are some comparison pics. The first shows the 2 rondel daggers currently in my collection. Both are historically sized, but from different ends of the size spectrum (and a good 50+ years apart in time).
The second shows the Wallace Rondel with another piece by Tod, the Spiderweb Quillon Dagger. Before the Wallace rondel, this was the thickest single-edged blade I'd owned at ~.3 inches/~7.55mm. The thickness of the Wallace rondel dagger is staggering by comparison.
Attachment: 81.95 KB
Attachment: 128.15 KB
The second shows the Wallace Rondel with another piece by Tod, the Spiderweb Quillon Dagger. Before the Wallace rondel, this was the thickest single-edged blade I'd owned at ~.3 inches/~7.55mm. The thickness of the Wallace rondel dagger is staggering by comparison.
Attachment: 81.95 KB
Attachment: 128.15 KB
Chad Arnow wrote: |
Just for fun, here are some comparison pics. The first shows the 2 rondel daggers currently in my collection. Both are historically sized, but from different ends of the size spectrum (and a good 50+ years apart in time).
The second shows the Wallace Rondel with another piece by Tod, the Spiderweb Quillon Dagger. Before the Wallace rondel, this was the thickest single-edged blade I'd owned at ~.3 inches/~7.55mm. The thickness of the Wallace rondel dagger is staggering by comparison. |
Having pictures with context makes an enormous difference.
Something showing the Wallace in-hand or with a relatively known quantity (one of the Albion XVa swords, for example) would also be helpful.
I never realized just how large that piece was, and while I'm not very familiar with the smaller rondel you have for comparison, I do believe I have a lower end piece of similar size and blade profile that allows me to visualize this better.
Page 1 of 1
You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum