I have goten interested in swords with lenticular blades that are clean (ie, no fuller or ridge or something) But I have had a really hard time finding images of swords like these. So please show off your lenticular swords for me, or images you found online, anything will do
Here's my lenticular bladed La Tene, by Brian Kerce
Attachment: 124.02 KB
Attachment: 124.02 KB
Lenticular cross-section blades can have fullers. Just to be clear, you don't want to see those, right?
Nathan Robinson wrote: |
Lenticular cross-section blades can have fullers. Just to be clear, you don't want to see those, right? |
Yes, I am not interested in fullered blades. To be honest, short swords are also not what I am looking for, fancy as they may be. Rather I am looking for more conventional swords only lenticular and without fullers.
For reference, here are some swords I've found so far:
[ Linked Image ]
https://dailytimewaster.blogspot.com/2016/10/probably-came-up-volga-in-longship-from.html
[ Linked Image ]
https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-a-scottish-broadsword-18th-century-straight-blade-with-a-lenticular-31695457.html
[ Linked Image ]
https://www.alamy.com/a-broadsword-for-officersearly-18th-century-oldca-1650straight-blade-of-lenticular-cross-sectionwith-solingen-kings-head-marks-on-both-sides-later-brass-hilt-with-central-guard-and-knuckle-bow-in-reliefthumb-ring-and-lions-head-pommel-old-replaced-leather-covered-wooden-scabbard-with-brass-fittings-length-97-cmhistorichistorical18th-centuryimperialaustriaaustriandanube-monarchyempireobjectobjectsstillsclippingclippingscut-outcut-outcut-outsthrustingthrustingshand-weaponhand-weaponsmelee-weaponmelee-weadditional-rights-clearences-not-available-image276232497.html
[ Linked Image ]
https://www.alamy.com/a-broadsword-dated-7-july-1815-double-edged-slightly-stained-blade-of-lenticular-section-the-obverse-with-etched-inscription-tr-with-god-for-king-and-fatherland-gilt-slightly-rubbed-brass-hilt-of-a-sabre-of-the-garde-du-corps-du-roi-with-bourbon-coat-of-arms-in-relief-on-the-knuckle-guard-three-side-bars-and-grip-strap-as-well-as-shark-skin-grip-with-silver-wire-wrap-the-guard-plate-engraved-versailles-7tre-july-1815-length-109-cm-interesting-weapon-reminiscent-of-the-day-the-prussian-troops-marched-into-paris-prussian-prussia-german-germany-militar-editorial-use-only-image247875429.html
The romano-viking sword in particular interests me and I would be especially interested in other swords like that one.
Martin Kallander wrote: |
[ Linked Image ] https://dailytimewaster.blogspot.com/2016/10/probably-came-up-volga-in-longship-from.html |
My bet would be that those are fakes...
I also question the authenticity of the lenticular viking sword shown. It has the strange raised inlay that is seen on other fakes.
Paul Hansen wrote: |
My bet would be that those are fakes... |
These were sold by Peter Finer and I'd also think they're fake.
Here's some lenticular British Iron Age swords...
The Scottish sword does have a fuller, but come on, the blade past the fuller is beautifully lenticular.
Attachment: 33.78 KB
Attachment: 112.92 KB
[ Download ]
The Scottish sword does have a fuller, but come on, the blade past the fuller is beautifully lenticular.
Attachment: 33.78 KB
Attachment: 112.92 KB
[ Download ]
Yes, I have been on this forum long enough to know you all despise those inlays like cats despise dogs. Like I said, I am looking for lenticular swords primarily and regardless of whether or not the viking sword is real, I doubt you'd contest the shape of it.
Having said that, I do think there is reason to not outright dismiss this particular one. Because it is a 10th century sword and because of the overall length. I'm sure many of you have read the Sylloge Tacticorum which stipulate roman infantry swords are supposed to be four spans long including the hilt. While Timothy and others think a span being 23.4 cm is unreasonable, I think they base this on poor grounds and so assuming a span is roughly 23.4 cm, this sword is just about exactly the right length of a roman infantry sword of this period (94 cm). Although I would point out saying the varangian guard mainly fought on foot is an assertion without definite evidence, if there were a sizable proportion of them who did then all the criteria for a sword like this to exist are met, wealthy infantrymen who would be required to carry swords with these dimensions and who would want hilts like these. As for the raised inlays, you should not rule out those could have been added at a later time to increase the sword's value on the antique market.
So yea, not exactly firm grounds, but the case can definitely be made and it should not be dismissed outright.
Having said that, I do think there is reason to not outright dismiss this particular one. Because it is a 10th century sword and because of the overall length. I'm sure many of you have read the Sylloge Tacticorum which stipulate roman infantry swords are supposed to be four spans long including the hilt. While Timothy and others think a span being 23.4 cm is unreasonable, I think they base this on poor grounds and so assuming a span is roughly 23.4 cm, this sword is just about exactly the right length of a roman infantry sword of this period (94 cm). Although I would point out saying the varangian guard mainly fought on foot is an assertion without definite evidence, if there were a sizable proportion of them who did then all the criteria for a sword like this to exist are met, wealthy infantrymen who would be required to carry swords with these dimensions and who would want hilts like these. As for the raised inlays, you should not rule out those could have been added at a later time to increase the sword's value on the antique market.
So yea, not exactly firm grounds, but the case can definitely be made and it should not be dismissed outright.
Martin,
I don't want you to have to seek out a book you don't have, but if you have access to DKM's "The Sword: Form and Thought," there should be several examples of lenticular swords in there.
...I bring this up, as a project of mine was to see if I could re-create one of the swords in the catalog to see if I could match its weight and balance. I cannot recall the sword's number in the catalog, but it is a lenticular "bastard sword" of really impressive size. The thing must have been primarily intended for use from horseback, and is otherwise "stereotypically Teutonic": it's huge! I don't think it would be appropriate to make a copy of the catalog entry, but I can show you the unfinished project when I get a chance. I'll give you numbers at that time as well.
I don't want you to have to seek out a book you don't have, but if you have access to DKM's "The Sword: Form and Thought," there should be several examples of lenticular swords in there.
...I bring this up, as a project of mine was to see if I could re-create one of the swords in the catalog to see if I could match its weight and balance. I cannot recall the sword's number in the catalog, but it is a lenticular "bastard sword" of really impressive size. The thing must have been primarily intended for use from horseback, and is otherwise "stereotypically Teutonic": it's huge! I don't think it would be appropriate to make a copy of the catalog entry, but I can show you the unfinished project when I get a chance. I'll give you numbers at that time as well.
Very good, I will procure this book as soon as possible. In the mean I would be very interested in this project of yours
Martin,
If you are intent on getting the book, note that there are in fact two books with the same name. One is an illustrated museum catalog, and another is a collection of academic articles.
...As an example, this is the book I'm referencing - it is a softcover (albeit a tough softcover) of relatively square proportions:
https://www.woodenswords.com/The_Sword_Form_and_Thought_p/book-sch01.htm
I will attempt to look through it tonight and see what other entries are present in there which would be of interest to you.
If you are intent on getting the book, note that there are in fact two books with the same name. One is an illustrated museum catalog, and another is a collection of academic articles.
...As an example, this is the book I'm referencing - it is a softcover (albeit a tough softcover) of relatively square proportions:
https://www.woodenswords.com/The_Sword_Form_and_Thought_p/book-sch01.htm
I will attempt to look through it tonight and see what other entries are present in there which would be of interest to you.
Here are the notable examples in The Sword: Form and Thought:
Exhibit 3: An executioner's sword: this is a two-handed weapon just over a meter long, designed to be used in two hands. A short fuller is present in the blade near the hilt.
Exhibit 19: This is the sword I am replicating to see if I can get the weight and balance correct. Over 1.2 meters long with a blade over 1 meter long itself, this is a purely lenticularly-bladed weapon. All the while, the museum exhibit weighs in at only 1.5kg, I will get pictures of my project this weekend.
...That said, I do now wonder if I overestimated the number of lenticular-bladed swords in the book; please forgive me, I did not have it when I made my previous remarks. However, I still would recommend the catalog to anyone! Note that there are other lenticular weapons, though they have substantial fullers.
Exhibit 3: An executioner's sword: this is a two-handed weapon just over a meter long, designed to be used in two hands. A short fuller is present in the blade near the hilt.
Exhibit 19: This is the sword I am replicating to see if I can get the weight and balance correct. Over 1.2 meters long with a blade over 1 meter long itself, this is a purely lenticularly-bladed weapon. All the while, the museum exhibit weighs in at only 1.5kg, I will get pictures of my project this weekend.
...That said, I do now wonder if I overestimated the number of lenticular-bladed swords in the book; please forgive me, I did not have it when I made my previous remarks. However, I still would recommend the catalog to anyone! Note that there are other lenticular weapons, though they have substantial fullers.
Well, buying a book for two images seems a bit unreasonable, especially when the swords in question are outliers like the short swords only in the other direction
Martin Kallander wrote: |
Well, buying a book for two images seems a bit unreasonable, especially when the swords in question are outliers like the short swords only in the other direction |
If you can afford it, buy the book while it's still available.
I've probably learned more from that book than from any other book about swords.
Granted, a lot of the information about sword design and engineering can also be found in the posts from Peter Johnsson and Vincent Chevallier here on the forum, but the book presents it in a logical format, demonstrates it with relevant examples and expands on the concepts in a few other directions.
Really excellent work and I can't recommend it enough.
Martin Kallander wrote: |
Like I said, I am looking for lenticular swords primarily and regardless of whether or not the viking sword is real, I doubt you'd contest the shape of it. |
Hmm, I think the vast majority of double edged Viking swords (where the blade is sufficiently preserved) has a fuller.
Maybe a few early examples (rather, likely late Migration age examples) have a Geibig Type 1 blade without fuller.
https://myArmoury.com/feature_geibig.html
I was hoping to get a better image (with me in it!) for scale, but the results just weren't going to cut it. So, I used the floor and a tape measure instead (the qama also helps). This unfinished sword blank is again Exhibit #19 from The Sword: Form and Thought. Once finished, this should weigh in at 3.3 to 3.5lb (with the fixtures) all the while measuring in at 50" overall. It's huge.
[ Linked Image ]
[ Linked Image ]
19th century
An Ames m1832 (copy of the French 1816) and an early Ames 1840s militia sword
Cheers
GC
Attachment: 21.99 KB
Attachment: 301.14 KB
[ Download ]
An Ames m1832 (copy of the French 1816) and an early Ames 1840s militia sword
Cheers
GC
Attachment: 21.99 KB
Attachment: 301.14 KB
[ Download ]
Glen A Cleeton wrote: |
19th century
An Ames m1832 (copy of the French 1816) and an early Ames 1840s militia sword Cheers GC |
Thank you, The first one is a very nice blade! I think something went wrong because the second image is a dagger with a fuller (although that is an interesting and unusual thing in and of itself)
Michael Beeching wrote: |
I was hoping to get a better image (with me in it!) for scale, but the results just weren't going to cut it. So, I used the floor and a tape measure instead (the qama also helps). This unfinished sword blank is again Exhibit #19 from The Sword: Form and Thought. Once finished, this should weigh in at 3.3 to 3.5lb (with the fixtures) all the while measuring in at 50" overall. It's huge.
[ Linked Image ] |
Nice so far, looking forward to the finished thing!
Page 1 of 2
You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum