A friend has come to own his great-grandfathers dirk, and is seeking help in learning more about its origins. The dirk blade was repaired about 15 years ago by a Scottish weapons shop in the Carolinas, which estimated the dirks age around 200 years old with the main blade much older. The family name is Davisson, but I have no idea where they were from or which regiment they may have been associated with.

Your thoughts are much appreciated - thank you!

---

 Attachment: 352.1 KB
Davisson dirk [ Download ]

 Attachment: 220.22 KB
[ Download ]

 Attachment: 248.86 KB
[ Download ]

It looks late nineteenth century to me. Possibly the same vintage as great-grand dad. It doesn't seem to be hallmarked, so it's probably got nickel alloy mounts or it's plated. Nickel alloys didn't come into common use before about 1830. Are the stones foil-backed?

Hopefully someone else with more knowledge will reply.

Would say probably mid-19th C rather than late, the grip hasn't fully changed into a useless attachment with extremes of size, shape and decoration . The stone mount has begun to rotate but the rest of the grip looks good and useable, blade looks funtional enough too.

Two hundred years old is unlikely. I agree that it could date from the mid to late 19th century but it could also be early twentieth century. It is in nice condition and has not seen a lot of wear. The leather appears supple (not dry and cracked) and 200 year old leather seldom is.

These dirks were made by many different companies in Scotland and England and frequently sold to officers in Highland regiments. They were seldom used and were an ornament and status symbol for the owner.

The dirks were nearly always marked by the maker. Have you found any hall marks or stampings any where on the sheath or the blades? That will be a big help in identifying and dating it.

Thanks, all. Here are my friend's answers to the questions posted in your replies:

I can answer some of the questions. No the stones are not foil backed and the mounts are silver and I do not believe they are plated. There is no mark visible on the blade. The guy who repaired it thought the mark may be under the handle but didn't want to risk looking for it.

Thanks again!

Lin, my friend had a sgian dubh custom-made to match the dirk, by the fellow in the Carolinas. His mark is "McRae". Does that name seem familiar - it was made about 15 years ago.

---

 Attachment: 88.59 KB
[ Download ]

Mike McRae is a well-known maker of Scottish-style dirks and sgians. He is still in North Carolina, and he is still active. His website is http://www.scotiametalwork.com/index.html where you can see several other pieces by him.

The mounts have a yellowish look, which is what made me think of nickel-alloy. The copper content is what makes it look yellow.

The stones aren't orange, which is what one would expect on a 20th c. dirk with glass stones.

Silver tarnish rubs off easily, and smells like silver. Try rubbing with your thumb. Nickel silver tarnish is hard to rub off, and doesn't smell like much of anything. Plated mounts might be dull gray on high spots where the plating has worn away.

"The stones actually look pink in bright light, unfortunately they appear orange in the photos because of lighting. I believe Mike McRae was the guy who made the repairs and used sterling silver to repair one of the stone retaining to match the original."

When I say orange stones, I mean ORANGE.

(gleaned from the web)

[ Linked Image ]

Not having ORANGE stones makes it more likely yours is 19th century.

Yes, and it has very orange stones, which is why I chose the image.

Here's more from my friend, and a photo of the distinctly NOT orange stone!

"I seem to remember McRae telling me the design on the main blade was an older style design which made him suspect my dirk was a "remake" from an older dirk utilizing the old blade which is why he thought any marks on the blade may be under the handle."

"Here is a photo that best represents the stones true color....they are not orange but pink."

Does the color of the stone offer any additional clues to the time period, maker or place of origin of this piece? As always thanks for your thoughts.

---

 Attachment: 151.83 KB
[ Download ]

Cairngorms were the stone of choice for Scottish dirks in the 19th century. They are a Scottish variant of smoky quartz with a nice orange-yellow colour.

[ Linked Image ]

Later imitation Cairngorms are bright orange glass. Earlier glass stones had a metallic foil underneath for colour.

Cairngorms, the real ones, became scarce due to their popularity, so other stones were sometimes used as a substitute, or just because.

The pink stone in the most recent image looks like a gemstone to me, not glass. Possibilities include pink topaz and pink tourmaline, but I'm just guessing.

Yes, I don't see anything which indicates the blade is older than the rest. I think most of us would be pleased with an heirloom like this. :)

Most military dirks follow an approved pattern. Officer's dirks usually have a distinct regimental pattern using regimental numbers and regimental badge motifs. Search the web using regiment names or numbers for examples. So, for example, "Black Watch dirk," "42nd Highlanders dirk," "Royal Highland Regiment dirk," etc. should all find Black Watch dirk images.
Yours could be a generic NCO pattern, but I don't think it is.

I think your dirk is a civilian dirk. They were common for full evening wear. I think the blade is unmarked because the maker was not the retailer. The maker left it blank, giving the retailer the option of etching their name on it. Or, the maker of the blade was not the maker of the rest.
I think it's not hallmarked because it was either for export, or is coin silver, or... ? I'm not sure on all of the laws regarding hallmarking of British silver. Most likely it was made in Glasgow, Edinburgh, or Sheffield.