Wow that is a long thread title. Had to change to this since the original would not fit.
So here goes. Looking from some thoughts and ideas from the group here.
Looking at having a sword made from the period around 1300 that could have been used by a participant in the Northern Crusades on either side.
What does everyone think of Type N pommel paired with a Style 5 guard? This would be paired on a Type XII blade.
Does this combination work for this time period and location? I do know that I would like to stay away from a Style 2 guard if at all possible.
Any and all thoughts and suggestions are welcome as always.
What pommel cross combination? | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total Votes : 2 |
Long type 1 would be most fitting... 3 and 7 are also present... Look at the examples here: https://www.academia.edu/487202/Swords_with_Pommels_of_Type_N
I personally think long type 1 looks the best...
I personally think long type 1 looks the best...
Luka Borscak wrote: |
Long type 1 would be most fitting... 3 and 7 are also present... |
Luka is quite correct... swords with this pommel type seem to generally be very uniform in style. The two main configurations seem to be long crossguards with a long (but not two-handed) grip, and shorter guards with one-hand length grips... Either way, the guard is almost always simple and straight, with just a few examples of each type being curved.
Thank you very much for the link Luka. That is exactly the type of information that I was looking for, and failed to find. I will be reading it today.
Thank you for the information as well Mark. This is definitely going to be a one handed sword so I will be looking at a Style 1 guard. Though the Style 7 does intrigue me.
Thank you for the information as well Mark. This is definitely going to be a one handed sword so I will be looking at a Style 1 guard. Though the Style 7 does intrigue me.
Having read through the link more thoroughly it would appear that the Type N pommel was teamed with a Style 6 cross in one example per the article. Since Oakeshott does describe the 6 as a curved form of the 5 I think that this will probably be the route that I will move forward with. Based of course the final decision of the smith and if they think that it will work.
There is still plenty of time though so further ideas would be appreciated.
I also looked at the superb Type O that J.D. had made by the A&A crew for some further thoughts.
There is still plenty of time though so further ideas would be appreciated.
I also looked at the superb Type O that J.D. had made by the A&A crew for some further thoughts.
Page 1 of 1
You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum