Hi All,
This is a slightly speculative reproduction of a crossbow form the 12thC. We know very very little except for some illustrations and descriptions as these were not very common weapons.
To load the bow, the shooter sits down and puts their feet either side of the bow and draws back. The trigger is not sprung so the nut is set into position and the string drawn over that and into position.
The bow must be unstrung after use, so as there is not likely to be a stringing bench around, there is a modified car back that is fitted to the stock and used to flex the bow and allow the string to be fitted; brace height is around 55mm.
The stock is ash, oiled with linseed and the cheeks are horn. The nut is antler with a steel insert and bound in with hemp cord. The bow is Italian yew, the bridle is hemp and the string is waxed linen. The last one of these I made, had horn nocks, but I think that actually it should not have done, and so this has self nocks.
The bow is 750mm wide and draws 150mm and is 150lbs.
I hope you like it and any thoughts or questions, please fire away.
Tod
Attachment: 181.66 KB
Attachment: 151.64 KB
Attachment: 136.62 KB
Attachment: 109.25 KB
I love the knotty bow. Should it have more sapwood, or is preferable to have more heartwood?
I can't help but wonder if the tiller need some more work, though? It seems several early crossbows show a knob at the end and a bit more overall shaping.
I can't help but wonder if the tiller need some more work, though? It seems several early crossbows show a knob at the end and a bit more overall shaping.
Mart Shearer wrote
No, the bow is good and the sapwood is usually around a quarter of the thickness.
I see them as fairly plain, but if you have any manuscript pictures that show what you are thinking of, I would love to see them.
Regards
Tod
Quote: |
I love the knotty bow. Should it have more sapwood, or is preferable to have more heartwood?
I can't help but wonder if the tiller need some more work, though? It seems several early crossbows show a knob at the end and a bit more overall shaping. |
No, the bow is good and the sapwood is usually around a quarter of the thickness.
I see them as fairly plain, but if you have any manuscript pictures that show what you are thinking of, I would love to see them.
Regards
Tod
Page 1 of 1
You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum