Greetings! I am an avid Viking Reenactor looking to improve my combat kit. I fight in an organization called the Adrian Empire, where Rebated steel combat (ACL style, but larger time frame) is a tier of combat that I'm striving to get geared up for. My primary time period of focus is the Late Viking age (Knut The Great to Harold Godwinsson) Anglo-Danish Huscarls, with some interest in the Varangian Guard. But enough about me, let's get to the purpose of this post: Gear!
I've got a few questions for my senior reenactors regarding the gear of both of these groups of warriors:
First, I was wondering if, by the time of Halold Godwinsson, the spangenhelm had been predominantly phased out in favor of the single piece dome typified by representations of the Norman Invaders? In regards to the Varangians, would they have replaced their native helm styles with the "Phrygian Cap" style helms used by the Byzantines?
Another sticking point is leg/arm and hand protection. Armoured combat requires arm, hand and leg protection be used and I was wondering if there are any examples of such that I can mimic? I've pretty much just resigned myself to using splint style armor on my legs and arms, but is there anything period that I can use for hands? All I can find the Visby gauntlets, but that's a few centuries too late for my tastes.
Any help that you guys can render would be much appreciated.
Sebastian Goriesky wrote: |
Greetings! I am an avid Viking Reenactor looking to improve my combat kit. I fight in an organization called the Adrian Empire, where Rebated steel combat (ACL style, but larger time frame) is a tier of combat that I'm striving to get geared up for. My primary time period of focus is the Late Viking age (Knut The Great to Harold Godwinsson) Anglo-Danish Huscarls, with some interest in the Varangian Guard. But enough about me, let's get to the purpose of this post: Gear!
I've got a few questions for my senior reenactors regarding the gear of both of these groups of warriors: First, I was wondering if, by the time of Halold Godwinsson, the spangenhelm had been predominantly phased out in favor of the single piece dome typified by representations of the Norman Invaders? In regards to the Varangians, would they have replaced their native helm styles with the "Phrygian Cap" style helms used by the Byzantines? Another sticking point is leg/arm and hand protection. Armoured combat requires arm, hand and leg protection be used and I was wondering if there are any examples of such that I can mimic? I've pretty much just resigned myself to using splint style armor on my legs and arms, but is there anything period that I can use for hands? All I can find the Visby gauntlets, but that's a few centuries too late for my tastes. Any help that you guys can render would be much appreciated. |
I can perhaps answer a little part of your question:
This illuminated manuscript from a work by John Skylitzes (11th century) shows Varangians armed and with helmets (according to wikipedia). The question is off course whether the manuscript depicts reality.
[ Linked Image ]
Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/03/Skylitzis_Chronicle_VARANGIAN_GUARD.jpg
ok, time to tackle this one
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~chrisandpeter/...fences.htm this is a good source
as for gauntlets? the best bet you'd have is to just resign yourself to not having a historical thing to work with... and just accept theyre there for safety only...
there are some possibilities maybe, there is evidence of a late roman scale covered mitten of sorts , and some sort of wierd overlapping plate thing used by the sassanians... the other alternative is to make a simple design of leather plates overlapping over the knuckles with a thumb piece or under maille perhaps
you're best off just accepting that gauntlets are a compromise for safely and are not a representation of historical armour of the period...
in reality anyone prior to the 13th century has pretty much no options for hard material gauntlets but splints are a good idea for legs and arms, another option for the forarms is copious amounts of padding covered with maille possibly scales but i'm not sure if chiopsella were specified as being scaled or not
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~chrisandpeter/...fences.htm this is a good source
as for gauntlets? the best bet you'd have is to just resign yourself to not having a historical thing to work with... and just accept theyre there for safety only...
there are some possibilities maybe, there is evidence of a late roman scale covered mitten of sorts , and some sort of wierd overlapping plate thing used by the sassanians... the other alternative is to make a simple design of leather plates overlapping over the knuckles with a thumb piece or under maille perhaps
you're best off just accepting that gauntlets are a compromise for safely and are not a representation of historical armour of the period...
in reality anyone prior to the 13th century has pretty much no options for hard material gauntlets but splints are a good idea for legs and arms, another option for the forarms is copious amounts of padding covered with maille possibly scales but i'm not sure if chiopsella were specified as being scaled or not
to play it safe, i'd suggest essentially building up a kit as an anglo danish huskarl without any major imperial modifications except perhaps small additions to your personal jewelery or decorations on the weapons...
its easiest and most reliable to think of yourself who has been in the guard a short time only and probably has the armour he owned when he arrived in the capital...
one thing a varangian though would be able to change is being that the range of colours and fabric choices go way up due to the empires richness and the guards payroll , perhaps they wore a turban to keep wioth the byzantine fashions (conjecture on my part) and wore a ceremnial style cloak on courtly occasions
though seeing as how a person joining the guard needs a certain level of wealth (i think they need to pay a pound of gold to be allowed to join before being tested ) as such your level of clothing from back home is likely to be fairly good quality however as a varangian you might have a nice silk shirt and a cotton one instead of all linen and wool
as for more general gear, think of yourself as a anglo danish huskarl first, as such your clothing, armour and weapon would reflect that...
helm- as you said single piece nasel helm, (dont bother with the phrygian cap seeing as how its more of a 12th century deal, not to mention, as i noted above, if you're in the guard you have enough money to afford your own helmet so youd likely keep that instead)
sword- standard late viking sword, check the typology for what was available, but a type X with brazilnut pommel or tea cosy pommel are a safe bet...
(also, dont worry about pattern welded blades, theyre more of something of earlier centuries, by the 11th monosteel blades had become just as good as a pattern welded one and not being nearly as expensive
armour- maille, for the sake of comfort padding can be a thin gambeson or several layers of wool clothing under the maille standalone thick gambesons pretty much have no evidence of existing in the region at that time so in terms of pure historical accuracy a gambeson is non existant but it makes fighting more comfy so most people wear one anyways
its easiest and most reliable to think of yourself who has been in the guard a short time only and probably has the armour he owned when he arrived in the capital...
one thing a varangian though would be able to change is being that the range of colours and fabric choices go way up due to the empires richness and the guards payroll , perhaps they wore a turban to keep wioth the byzantine fashions (conjecture on my part) and wore a ceremnial style cloak on courtly occasions
though seeing as how a person joining the guard needs a certain level of wealth (i think they need to pay a pound of gold to be allowed to join before being tested ) as such your level of clothing from back home is likely to be fairly good quality however as a varangian you might have a nice silk shirt and a cotton one instead of all linen and wool
as for more general gear, think of yourself as a anglo danish huskarl first, as such your clothing, armour and weapon would reflect that...
helm- as you said single piece nasel helm, (dont bother with the phrygian cap seeing as how its more of a 12th century deal, not to mention, as i noted above, if you're in the guard you have enough money to afford your own helmet so youd likely keep that instead)
sword- standard late viking sword, check the typology for what was available, but a type X with brazilnut pommel or tea cosy pommel are a safe bet...
(also, dont worry about pattern welded blades, theyre more of something of earlier centuries, by the 11th monosteel blades had become just as good as a pattern welded one and not being nearly as expensive
armour- maille, for the sake of comfort padding can be a thin gambeson or several layers of wool clothing under the maille standalone thick gambesons pretty much have no evidence of existing in the region at that time so in terms of pure historical accuracy a gambeson is non existant but it makes fighting more comfy so most people wear one anyways
Niels Just Rasmussen wrote: |
This illuminated manuscript from a work by John Skylitzes (11th century) shows Varangians armed and with helmets (according to wikipedia). The question is off course whether the manuscript depicts reality.
|
They are not Varangians. There is only one likely image of a Varangian and he is depicted barchested.
[ Linked Image ]
We don't have the faintest idea what armour Varangians wore but mail is more likely than anything else.
Dan Howard wrote: | ||
They are not Varangians. There is only one likely image of a Varangian and he is depicted barchested. [ Linked Image ] We don't have the faintest idea what armour Varangians wore but mail is more likely than anything else. |
Thanks for the correction Dan.
A bare chested image is interesting. I suppose it is the 2-handed Dane Axe that makes for the identification (and perhaps the sword as well)?
The big question is next whether it is reality OR a Roman/Byzantine "artistic/literary type" of the archetypical barbarian warrior fighting bare chested.
Doesn't matter. If he isn't a Varangian then my point still stands about us not knowing what armour they wore.
Don't we have any description of theie equipment at Alexiad? I remember dimly her mentions them wearing armor during a mass at Hagia Sophia
We don't know which battle that is depicting.
Pedro Paulo Gaião wrote: |
Don't we have any description of theie equipment at Alexiad? I remember dimly her mentions them wearing armor during a mass at Hagia Sophia |
I can't recall anything like this but it would really help if she does describe Varangian equipment.
Niels Just Rasmussen wrote: |
This illuminated manuscript from a work by John Skylitzes (11th century) shows Varangians armed and with helmets (according to wikipedia). The question is off course whether the manuscript depicts reality. |
It's worth noting the Biblioteca Nacional de España assigns the manuscript a 12th century dating, and origin in Sicily. The armor related images have been cropped and saved on Manuscript Miniatures.
http://manuscriptminiatures.com/search/?manuscript=4203
I suspect the attribution of these soldiers as "Varangians" is based solely on the fact they are equipped with "Danish" axes.
http://manuscriptminiatures.com/4203/9938/
But what of this fellow?
http://manuscriptminiatures.com/4203/13418/
If any of you can translate the Greek rubricated captions of the picture, it might provide some clues.
Attachment: 15.7 KB
Attachment: 9.36 KB
Attachment: 9.62 KB
Mart Shearer wrote: |
But what of this fellow? http://manuscriptminiatures.com/4203/13418/ |
I'm pretty sure that is depicting some legendary Biblical act as I've stumbled into a large number of images portraying essentially the same thing. Being familiar with the idea of axe wielders as shock troops the first time I found one I thought to myself "Whoah! Dane axes were used in siege warfare to open castle gates?!" but then I found way too many similar scenes across too many centuries. Still an interesting reference point though and clearly culturally significant.
Mike Ruhala wrote: | ||
I'm pretty sure that is depicting some legendary Biblical act as I've stumbled into a large number of images portraying essentially the same thing. Being familiar with the idea of axe wielders as shock troops the first time I found one I thought to myself "Whoah! Dane axes were used in siege warfare to open castle gates?!" but then I found way too many similar scenes across too many centuries. Still an interesting reference point though and clearly culturally significant. |
while it is later, napoleonic era sappers used axes for the sake of breaking down doors so not impossible but also not too likely seeing as how a daneaxe isnt really designed for breaking through timbers.... and for anything larger than a simple house door i;d imagine the imperial engineers would make battering rams
Dan Howard wrote: | ||
They are not Varangians. There is only one likely image of a Varangian and he is depicted barchested. [ Linked Image ] We don't have the faintest idea what armour Varangians wore but mail is more likely than anything else. |
in the early century of the gaurd i'd imagine theyd be armoured with whatever they came with, those without any armour at all (unusual considering the requirement to pay a couple of pounds of gold to jjust get in at all.....) would probably be subjected to any military manuals of the period, and the manuals state that the kavadion is the absolute basic armour for heavy infantry... aka the long body gambeson with sleeves either to the wrist or elbow 'as thick as can be stitched' with openings to allow soldiers to fold the sleeve back and button to the shoulder to increase movement when not fighting...
Thank you all for your fantastic advice! I always appreciate assistance in bringing more accuracy to my reenactment
William P wrote: |
in the early century of the gaurd i'd imagine theyd be armoured with whatever they came with, those without any armour at all (unusual considering the requirement to pay a couple of pounds of gold to jjust get in at all.....) would probably be subjected to any military manuals of the period, and the manuals state that the kavadion is the absolute basic armour for heavy infantry... aka the long body gambeson with sleeves either to the wrist or elbow 'as thick as can be stitched' with openings to allow soldiers to fold the sleeve back and button to the shoulder to increase movement when not fighting... |
This might apply for regular troops. We know that Byzantine officers and anyone else with the means wore mail, preferably Frankish mail. Varangians were paid well enough to afford any kind of armour they wanted. Why would they settle on inferior armour when they could have mail?
Following for updates, I am woefully ignorant on this subject
Dan Howard wrote: | ||
This might apply for regular troops. We know that Byzantine officers and anyone else with the means wore mail, preferably Frankish mail. Varangians were paid well enough to afford any kind of armour they wanted. Why would they settle on inferior armour when they could have mail? |
ive done some more research into this recently, from what i understand, the varangians were part of the hetaroi and any applicant for the hetaroi had to provide a bounty of either 7, 10 or 16 pounds of gold for entry into the little, middle and great, companions (respectively)
the varangian guard i believe was actually part of the biggest one, the great companions, that means a bounty of 16 pounds of gold to just get in..
(most of this is apparently contained in constantine VII's manual 'the book of ceremonies'
i dont know how much a shirt of mail cost but i suspect someone capable of scrounging together that much cash probably had enough to buy a shirt of mail and a helmet back home in addition to also having a decent level of quality for their weapons.
and as you point out mail was so ubiquitous even among the imperial forces itself that they wouldnt see any need to add extra armour. cosidering that mail was perfectly fine for medium strength byzantine native cavalry as well, for heavy infantry to have all mail was probably pretty good level of protection.
lastly. from what i am told, it was PREFERABLE to keep the varangians looking as foreign as possible
The purpose was 'to make the point that everyone in the Known World knew of and owed allegiance to the Emperor.'
kinda like how the chinese had their ideas of being the superior central guardians of the world and therefore liked to emphasise the idea that everyone else thought they were the best thing on the planet
New question. Scrounging about the internet for maille rings ('cause a finished hauberk is beyond my price range) I've found both flat cross section rings and round cross section rings. As both are dome rivets, is there one type that is more historically accurate for the Viking Age, or is it simply a fabrication created by two different modern production techniques.
Page 1 of 2
You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum