Go to page 1, 2  Next

Interesting articles from other sites.
Rather than have them spread all over the place, I thought it might be useful to have them collected in one thread.

This one recently released:

http://www.academia.edu/3572087/Sword_parts_a...al_society

Quote:
A key feature of swords from the Migration and Merovingian Period is that they consist of many different parts, as recently highlighted by the discovery of the Staffordshire hoard. This paper seeks to order sword parts and their depositional contexts, by interpreting them as symbols of kleptocracy and animated by their object biographies in the Migration and Merovingian Period martial society.


The link to this one was lost in 'the great crash of ought thirteen'

http://www.academia.edu/2649664/A_group_of_Vi...f_the_time

Quote:
During the 1998 excavations on the Garrison site at Birka, Uppland, Sweden, a spectacular deposit was found in a post pit belonging to the Warrior’s House, one of the finds in which was a bronze sword chape of a type not previously found in Birka. The scarcity of this type of chape and its distribution pattern aroused a series of questions concerning its function, iconographic symbols and whether or not the pattern of distribution of a materialculture through diplomatic and political contacts can reflect a political landscape? An iconographic study, partly based on a surface structure analysis, is made of the newly found chape.


and I just found this while looking for the last one:

http://www.academia.edu/1102223/The_Ljudota_S...Viking_Age

I'll add more as they come to light, please do likewise.

Enjoy.
Makes me wish I could read Slovak, but the pic.s alone make this worth while: http://www.academia.edu/4526468/Swords_from_t..._Territory
Cheers.
Good stuff!
Thank you for posting!
Michael Harley wrote:
Makes me wish I could read Slovak, but the pic.s alone make this worth while: http://www.academia.edu/4526468/Swords_from_t..._Territory
Cheers.


This survey actually includes pieces from modern day Czech Republic - specifically the Moravian region from the 11th - 13th centuries. :) If memory serves, some of these pieces are on display in the Brno and Olomouc museums (the former really needs an overhaul, the latter is small but quite decent).
Iain Norman wrote:
Michael Harley wrote:
Makes me wish I could read Slovak, but the pic.s alone make this worth while: http://www.academia.edu/4526468/Swords_from_t..._Territory
Cheers.


This survey actually includes pieces from modern day Czech Republic - specifically the Moravian region from the 11th - 13th centuries. :) If memory serves, some of these pieces are on display in the Brno and Olomouc museums (the former really needs an overhaul, the latter is small but quite decent).


Some very interesting swords here! I really like some of those unusual pommels...
Iain Norman wrote:
Michael Harley wrote:
Makes me wish I could read Slovak, but the pic.s alone make this worth while: http://www.academia.edu/4526468/Swords_from_t..._Territory
Cheers.


This survey actually includes pieces from modern day Czech Republic - specifically the Moravian region from the 11th - 13th centuries. :) If memory serves, some of these pieces are on display in the Brno and Olomouc museums (the former really needs an overhaul, the latter is small but quite decent).

There are some great publications on swords coming out of Czech Republic in the last decade. I LOVE LOVE LOVE how they all include detailed metallurgical reports with construction methods. I totally geek out on sword metallurgy.
The Typochronology of Sword Pommels from the Staffordshire Hoard

http://finds.org.uk/staffshoardsymposium/pape...jeansoulat

Another excellent article from the Portable Antiquities Scheme.

Enjoy.
More from the Czech Republic, Dussacks with broad blades:

https://www.academia.edu/5369387/Dussacks_with_broad_blades_and_a_probable_method_of_their_manufacturing
An Experimental Investigation of the Functional Hypothesis and Evolutionary Advantage of Stone-Tipped Spears.

http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F1...ne.0104514
Sword and Dagger Pommels Associated with the Crusades - Donald LaRocca
Metropolitan Museum Journal Vol.46/2011

https://www.academia.edu/8267728/Sword_and_Dagger_Pommels_Associated_with_the_Crusades
Afonso ‘the African’ and his Army: The Pastrana Tapestries as a Visual Encyclopedia for the Study of Arms and Armor - Donald LaRocca

https://www.academia.edu/8267811/Afonso_the_African_and_his_Army_The_Pastrana_Tapestries_as_a_Visual_Encyclopedia_for_the_Study_of_Arms_and_Armor
An English Armor for the King of Portugal - Donald J. LaRocca

https://www.academia.edu/8351544/An_English_Armor_for_the_King_of_Portugal
Monsters, Heroes and Fools: a Survey of Embossed Armor in Germany and Austria, ca. 1475-ca. 1575 - Donald J. LaRocca

https://www.academia.edu/8504927/Monsters_Heroes_and_Fools_a_Survey_of_Embossed_Armor_in_Germany_and_Austria_ca._1475-ca._1575
The Mysterious Geometry of Swordsmanship, Gorgeously Illustrated

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_vault/2014/09/...bault.html
King Tut’s Dagger Is Out of This World

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/king-tut-rsquo-s-dagger-is-out-of-this-world/

New study shows that meteorites rather than terrestrial ore were the sources of Bronze-Age iron.
Michael Harley wrote:
King Tut’s Dagger Is Out of This World

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/king-tut-rsquo-s-dagger-is-out-of-this-world/

New study shows that meteorites rather than terrestrial ore were the sources of Bronze-Age iron.


There is no point analysing the nickel content. Nickel is preferentially lost as meteorites oxidise, so the longer they have been on Earth, the less nickel they contain. There are surviving daggers that we know were made of meteoritic iron yet contain almost no nickel.

There are naturally-occurring nickel-iron alloys in several parts of the world - where basaltic magmas have intruded into carbonaceous sediments and these can be made into weapons (no smelting required) that are indistinguishable from Tut's dagger. There were also nickel-bearing iron ores in that part of the world during that time so any iron smelted from those ores would also contain nickel.

Apparently the best indicator of meteoritic iron is whether it contains cobalt, not nickel. Tut's dagger does contain cobalt so it could have been forged from meteoritic iron. An easier way is to simply see if it has any bloomery slag in it.
Dan Howard wrote:
Michael Harley wrote:
King Tut’s Dagger Is Out of This World

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/king-tut-rsquo-s-dagger-is-out-of-this-world/

New study shows that meteorites rather than terrestrial ore were the sources of Bronze-Age iron.


There is no point analysing the nickel content. Nickel is preferentially lost as meteorites oxidise, so the longer they have been on Earth, the less nickel they contain. There are surviving daggers that we know were made of meteoritic iron yet contain almost no nickel.

There are naturally-occurring nickel-iron alloys in several parts of the world - where basaltic magmas have intruded into carbonaceous sediments and these can be made into weapons (no smelting required) that are indistinguishable from Tut's dagger. There were also nickel-bearing iron ores in that part of the world during that time so any iron smelted from those ores would also contain nickel.

Apparently the best indicator of meteoritic iron is whether it contains cobalt, not nickel. Tut's dagger does contain cobalt so it could have been forged from meteoritic iron. An easier way is to simply see if it has any bloomery slag in it.

The department of Earth and Planetary sciences disagrees with you strongly on this, Dan. There's strong reason they did the nickel tests that make the article completely valid and rather fascinating. It's certainly worth the read.

Source: http://meteorites.wustl.edu/id/metal.htm One note in particular is mentioned on page 4, where they talk about the distinct facet of having the Nickel oxidizing.
As I already said, we have blades that we know were made from meteroritic iron that contain almost no nickel at all.
1. There's plenty of point in measuring the nickel content. It doesn't automatically give a yes/no result for whether the iron is meteoric in origin, but there is still plenty of point in such analysis. In this case, the dagger is over 10% nickel, which by itself is enough to say it's almost certainly of meteoric origin. As a rule of thumb, above 8% means meteoric.

2. The cobalt content was measured as well, since the cobalt:nickel ratio is important when trying to identify whether iron is of meteoric origin. Without knowing the nickel content, the cobalt content is of little use - it's the cobalt:nickel ratio that's most useful.

3. Naturally-occurring telluric nickel-iron alloys are distinguishable from Tutankhamun's dagger, just on the basis of their nickel content (typically under 4%). More generally, it can be difficult to identify iron as telluric native iron rather than meteoric in origin, since as well as some meteorites having similarly low nickel content, telluric iron can show Widmanstätten patterns (a Widmanstätten pattern does identify iron as non-smelted, but doesn't distinguish between telluric and meteoric). I haven't seen the range of cobalt:nickel ratios for high-nickel telluric iron (Jambon only compares high-nickel smelted alloys), but perhaps these would help distinguish between such telluric alloys and low-nickel meteoric iron.

4. It's very common for pop science web articles to not give the full details. It's often useful to read the actual scientific paper describing the work before dismissing the results. Sometimes even to find out what the results are, since the pop article doesn't always get it right.

Jambon doesn't analyse the dagger; he uses the measurements by Comelli et al. 2016, (10.8% Ni, 0.58% Co, and also quotes the measurement given by Ströbele et al. 2016 (ref below), 12.9% Ni.

Comelli et al. 2016: https://doi.org/10.1111/maps.12664

Jambon: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2017.09.008

Ströbele et al., 2016:
F. Ströbele, K. Broschat, C. Koeberl, J. Zipfel, H. Hassan, Ch Eckmann
The iron objects of tutanchamun. Metalla
Archäometrie und Denkmalpflege 2016, Göttingen
Sonderheft, 8 (2016), pp. 186-189
A new Byzantine type of swords (7th – 11th centuries)

https://www.academia.edu/16719873/A_new_Byzantine_type_of_swords_7th_11th_centuries_

First tentative steps at developing a typology of Byzantine swords despite dearth of artefacts.
Go to page 1, 2  Next

Page 1 of 2

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum




All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum