Hello everyone,
I am looking to commission a bloomery iron/shear steel, narrow-bladed broken-back seax with a 20 inch (ish) blade and long grip in the style of the Baegnoth and Battersea examples. I know that the Baegnoth has been dated to the 9-10th century. I am hoping that such blade and grip forms can be found on later examples, say late 11th to early 12th. century.
I already have the typical broader laded broken-back example from this period but wanted something longer and narrower.
Given the cost I want to get the historical details down.
What do folks think?
I'm not sure about 12th century. My understanding is the seax was only prevalent into the 11th. But I think that Owen Bush is your man for this project.
Jeremy,
You'll probably want to see this thread if you have not already: http://www.myArmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t=30104. Long story short, we have visual evidence of seaxes being used, at least in some places, up to the close of the 12th century.
You'll probably want to see this thread if you have not already: http://www.myArmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t=30104. Long story short, we have visual evidence of seaxes being used, at least in some places, up to the close of the 12th century.
Craig Peters wrote: |
Jeremy,
You'll probably want to see this thread if you have not already: http://www.myArmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t=30104. Long story short, we have visual evidence of seaxes being used, at least in some places, up to the close of the 12th century. |
Oh, I am very sure that the broad bladed type seaxes were used into the 12th. century- ala the Honey Lane example.
I want to know if there are narrow longer broken-back seaxes datable to, say, the second half of the 11th. century.
So what do folks think is think is the latest date we can give to the manufacture of the longer, narrow-bladed broken-back seax?
Jeremy, OK, I'm coming from this from a different angle:
Wouldnt a more pertinent question be:
Once you have that question, you can start to think of when they stopped it.
Wouldnt a more pertinent question be:
Quote: |
So what do folks think is the last geographical area and social group to cling onto the manufacture of the longer, narrow-bladed broken-back seax? |
Once you have that question, you can start to think of when they stopped it.
James Moore wrote: | ||
Jeremy, OK, I'm coming from this from a different angle:
Wouldnt a more pertinent question be:
Once you have that question, you can start to think of when they stopped it. |
Well James,
If this phrasing better expresses the idea then fine.
sorry, I hope that comment didnt come over as pedantic or sarcastic.
I was more thinking, if I were looking for evidence of something, I'd first look at working out where they would likely continue to be used, and start looking at source material from there.
you're probably not going to see AS-style broken-back saxes in many depictions of English militaries post-1066, after all, as they've been supplanted by the Normans as the military elite, and the lower classes are being heavily repressed. So where to look? Ireland? Hebrides? Maybe. I'm not sure where else.
Does that make sense?
I was more thinking, if I were looking for evidence of something, I'd first look at working out where they would likely continue to be used, and start looking at source material from there.
you're probably not going to see AS-style broken-back saxes in many depictions of English militaries post-1066, after all, as they've been supplanted by the Normans as the military elite, and the lower classes are being heavily repressed. So where to look? Ireland? Hebrides? Maybe. I'm not sure where else.
Does that make sense?
For some reason, given the Norwegians' liking for seaxes I would think they may be where the long seaxes prevailed, evolving gradually into the single-edged Viking sword.
That's just off the top of my head, though.
That's just off the top of my head, though.
I found this thread with a handy reference using a typology/geography/chronological reference developed by fellow forumite Kirk Lee Spencer.
http://www.myArmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t=18459
In my proposed project/recreation- which is the aim of this thread- I seem to be referring to type III and/or type IV longseaxes. According to this chart both had their greatest popularity during the 9th. c. with some being made or used (not sure if they were being made) into the early 11th. c.
These were anglo-saxon weapons and different in blade shape to Nordic seaxes/longseaxes.
So does anyone know of what dates have been assigned to SPECIFIC archeological examples of the type III and/or type IV longseax.
I am wondering if certain design elements would characterize a later example of this sub-type. I presume that given a 150 year era of manufacture and use some changes occurred.
http://www.myArmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t=18459
In my proposed project/recreation- which is the aim of this thread- I seem to be referring to type III and/or type IV longseaxes. According to this chart both had their greatest popularity during the 9th. c. with some being made or used (not sure if they were being made) into the early 11th. c.
These were anglo-saxon weapons and different in blade shape to Nordic seaxes/longseaxes.
So does anyone know of what dates have been assigned to SPECIFIC archeological examples of the type III and/or type IV longseax.
I am wondering if certain design elements would characterize a later example of this sub-type. I presume that given a 150 year era of manufacture and use some changes occurred.
http://www.myArmoury.com/talk/download.php?id=1261
The Little Bealings seax is dated to the 10th century, and is one of my favorites. More information on it can be found here: http://www.myArmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?p=178901 and here: [url] http://www.bladesmithsforum.com/index.php?showtopic=18002[/url]
With a 30 inch blade it would definitely qualify as a langsax. It is the latest dated one I've found yet, but I'll keep looking.
The Little Bealings seax is dated to the 10th century, and is one of my favorites. More information on it can be found here: http://www.myArmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?p=178901 and here: [url] http://www.bladesmithsforum.com/index.php?showtopic=18002[/url]
With a 30 inch blade it would definitely qualify as a langsax. It is the latest dated one I've found yet, but I'll keep looking.
G Ezell wrote: |
http://www.myArmoury.com/talk/download.php?id=1261
The Little Bealings seax is dated to the 10th century, and is one of my favorites. More information on it can be found here: http://www.myArmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?p=178901 and here: [url] http://www.bladesmithsforum.com/index.php?showtopic=18002[/url] With a 30 inch blade it would definitely qualify as a langsax. It is the latest dated one I've found yet, but I'll keep looking. |
Thank you sir!
You have answered my question! I am looking for dates of examples- I realize it is next to impossible to answer the question of how long folks used such weapons given the less than scant pictorial or statuary evidence.
This is a beautiful seax indeed- and at 30 inches, very long- much longer than I would expect.
My dating information for the Little Bealings seax came from "Anglo-Saxon Thegn AD 449-1066" by Mark Harrison, and seems about right. I am no expert, but in England one can see a definite shift in the culture occurring with the Norman conquest, it seems this is the point where the type III-IV seax-style knife, be it sword-sized or paring knife, goes from being very popular to out-dated, and begins to die out.
One day I will make a replica of the Little Bealings seax...
One day I will make a replica of the Little Bealings seax...
Quote: |
One day I will make a replica of the Little Bealings seax... |
Hi George, is that a request for funding or just showing off? :D
G Ezell wrote: |
http://www.myArmoury.com/talk/download.php?id=1261
The Little Bealings seax is dated to the 10th century, and is one of my favorites. More information on it can be found here: http://www.myArmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?p=178901 and here: [url] http://www.bladesmithsforum.com/index.php?showtopic=18002[/url] With a 30 inch blade it would definitely qualify as a langsax. It is the latest dated one I've found yet, but I'll keep looking. |
Hi Mr. Ezell,
DO you know anything about the seas just above the Little Beatings in the photo you included? I like the shape on that one and it does appear to still be a longseax.
Jeremy V. Krause wrote: | ||
Hi Mr. Ezell, DO you know anything about the seas just above the Little Beatings in the photo you included? I like the shape on that one and it does appear to still be a longseax. |
Sadly, I know nothing about that one.
J. Nicolaysen wrote: | ||
Hi George, is that a request for funding or just showing off? :D |
More of a statement of intent, setting a long term goal for myself....:)
So here is an image provided by Mr. Ezell. This seax has an 18 inche blade. Does anyone have any more information on it or would guess a date.
[ Linked Image ]
I am hoping for an example or solid views on the existence of narrow bladed seaxes (basically anything but broad-seax Honey Lane type) -post 900 (950 even better)- with a blade longer than say 15 inches. So far the only example I have seen is the 30 inch little beatings example.
I need something to contrast my beautiful broken back seas made by Tod and Owen.
[ Linked Image ]
[ Linked Image ]
I am hoping for an example or solid views on the existence of narrow bladed seaxes (basically anything but broad-seax Honey Lane type) -post 900 (950 even better)- with a blade longer than say 15 inches. So far the only example I have seen is the 30 inch little beatings example.
I need something to contrast my beautiful broken back seas made by Tod and Owen.
[ Linked Image ]
George Ezell said:
I think you will do it great justice and I know a lot of people here will be very excited to see it. Thanks for that other thread about it, it was interesting to read.
Jeremy V. Krause said:
That is a really nice one. Please keep us posted on your journey for this narrow-blade type.
Quote: |
More of a statement of intent, setting a long term goal for myself....Happy |
I think you will do it great justice and I know a lot of people here will be very excited to see it. Thanks for that other thread about it, it was interesting to read.
Jeremy V. Krause said:
Quote: |
I need something to contrast my beautiful broken back seas made by Tod and Owen. |
That is a really nice one. Please keep us posted on your journey for this narrow-blade type.
Jeremy, it appears my estimate of 18 inches long was a bit off, according to this image it is closer to 13-14 inches (if it is indeed the same blade)... However, this image may also be useful in and of itself.
Attachment: 34.41 KB
Attachment: 34.41 KB
Page 1 of 2
You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum