myArmoury.com - Value original chain mail

Posts: 77 Location: The Netherlands

Sun 23 Feb, 2014 2:22 am

Value original chain mail

Hi There,

I have this original mail shirt which I like to sell but not sure what to ask for it :confused: . It's guaranteed original but probably made out of two or more pieces. It saw some heavy use during it's active life.

Does someone know what would be a reasonable price to ask?

Thanks!

Attachment: 206.64 KB

Attachment: 162.97 KB

Attachment: 176.56 KB

Attachment: 186.35 KB

Attachment: 112.75 KB

Attachment: 165.31 KB

Profile PM E-mail

Foong Chen Hong

Quote

Posts: 150 Location: Malaysia

Sun 23 Feb, 2014 2:27 am

Given info of which century it came from would be about to judge its value more.

Profile PM E-mail

M Hermes

Quote

Posts: 77 Location: The Netherlands

Sun 23 Feb, 2014 2:44 am

Foong Chen Hong wrote:

Given info of which century it came from would be about to judge its value more.

According to the conservator of the Dutch Weapon museum it could be 15 century. Problem is that one part is made from very heavy thick rings and the other part is much thinner. The rings are all hand forged and riveted.

Profile PM E-mail

Dan Howard

Quote

Posts: 3,642 Location: Maitland, NSW, Australia

Sun 23 Feb, 2014 4:06 am

Mail shirts don't hang that way. The weave needs to be rotated 90 degrees. Can we get a close up of the seam up the front and the back? My guess is that you have two unrelated pieces of mail that were joined together by someone in the museum. They have taken some rings with missing rivets and wrapped them around the edge links to hold them together. It would be better if you pulled them back apart and spread them separately on a flat surface. I'd be surprised if either piece was 15th century European.

Profile PM

M Hermes

Quote

Posts: 77 Location: The Netherlands

Sun 23 Feb, 2014 4:44 am

Dan Howard wrote:

Mail shirts don't hang that way. The weave needs to be rotated 90 degrees. Can we get a close up of the seam up the front and the back? My guess is that you have two unrelated pieces of mail that were joined together by someone in the museum. They have taken some rings with missing rivets and wrapped them around the edge links to hold them together. It would be better if you pulled them back apart and spread them separately on a flat surface. I'd be surprised if either piece was 15th century European.

I didn't bought it in a museum. The conservator only had a look at it.
Your probably right Dan, that it is composed of two different pieces of mail.
I'm a novice when it comes to armor, what would be the difference between original European mail and mail made in other parts of the world?

Profile PM E-mail

Mark Griffin

Quote

Posts: 802 Location: The Welsh Marches, in the hills above Newtown, Powys.

Mon 24 Feb, 2014 2:38 am

There are loads of mail threads on here that give some answers to these but mail is a pretty wide ranging subject and is notoriously difficult to identify properly.

But what Dan says is completely right, its made up of two different types of mail and done by someone who wasn't that aware of how mail works. I'd be interested to see it laid flat. It wouldn't affect the value of what you have really, properly presented they would be of interest to some collectors, possibly a few hundred $$'s each bit.

Profile PM

Dan Howard

Quote

Posts: 3,642 Location: Maitland, NSW, Australia

Mon 24 Feb, 2014 4:35 am

I'd pay a few hundred $$ for the patch of heavy links.

Profile PM

Robert MacPherson

Quote

Posts: 141 Location: Jeffersonville USA

Mon 24 Feb, 2014 5:57 am

I concur with Dan. The heavy piece is the interesting one.

Mac

Profile PM Website

Mart Shearer

Quote

Posts: 1,303 Location: Jackson, MS, USA

Mon 24 Feb, 2014 6:46 am

M Hermes wrote:

Dan Howard wrote:

Mail shirts don't hang that way. The weave needs to be rotated 90 degrees. Can we get a close up of the seam up the front and the back? My guess is that you have two unrelated pieces of mail that were joined together by someone in the museum. They have taken some rings with missing rivets and wrapped them around the edge links to hold them together. It would be better if you pulled them back apart and spread them separately on a flat surface. I'd be surprised if either piece was 15th century European.

I didn't bought it in a museum. The conservator only had a look at it.
Your probably right Dan, that it is composed of two different pieces of mail.
I'm a novice when it comes to armor, what would be the difference between original European mail and mail made in other parts of the world?

Regardless of who joined the pieces together, I agree with Dan that it may be worth taking them back apart. The joining rings which have been sprung or have missing rivets may be of use for study. Images from both sides will allow examination of the rivet type used, and images of empty rivet holes are sometimes of use. You could then see if the lighter mail was originally joined to the heavier mail. Additionally, any tailoring -- one ring going through three or five rather than four -- might give clues as to how the mail was originally used.

Profile PM

M Hermes

Quote

Posts: 77 Location: The Netherlands

Mon 24 Feb, 2014 10:50 am

Dan Howard wrote:

Mail shirts don't hang that way. The weave needs to be rotated 90 degrees. Can we get a close up of the seam up the front and the back? My guess is that you have two unrelated pieces of mail that were joined together by someone in the museum. They have taken some rings with missing rivets and wrapped them around the edge links to hold them together. It would be better if you pulled them back apart and spread them separately on a flat surface. I'd be surprised if either piece was 15th century European.

Ok, I took it apart and it appears that I have 3 or 4 different types op chain mail. I will try to be as specific as possible.

First one consists of a pattern of 4 flat rings, 11mm in diameter, which are linked with 1 round ring (not flattened) also 11mm in diameter.

Second one, flat rings about 11mm in diameter, 4 in 1, but all the same. This piece starts with 1,5 mm thick rings but the rings seems to get smaller after about 20cm.

Third one is completely different. The rings are large, 14mm in diameter, whole flat and only 1mm thick. This piece is very light.

last one, thick rings, 11mm in diameter, 4 in 1. Heavy piece.

Attachment: 189.18 KB

first one

Attachment: 170.7 KB

first one

Attachment: 191.46 KB

second one

Attachment: 196.59 KB

second one

Attachment: 182.85 KB

third one

Attachment: 146.2 KB

third one

Attachment: 182.84 KB

last one

Attachment: 191.77 KB

last one

Profile PM E-mail

Mart Shearer

Quote

Posts: 1,303 Location: Jackson, MS, USA

Mon 24 Feb, 2014 12:15 pm

M Hermes wrote:

Ok, I took it apart and it appears that I have 3 or 4 different types op chain mail. I will try to be as specific as possible.

First one consists of a pattern of 4 flat rings, 11mm in diameter, which are linked with 1 round ring (not flattened) also 11mm in diameter.

It appears that this is of demi-riveted construction, with the round rings being riveted and the flattened rings being solid. Can you find a missing rivet within the piece? It appears that the rivets are domed on the visible side. Is the reverse side similarly domed, or does it simply appear to be a piece of round wire?

Quote:

Second one, flat rings about 11mm in diameter, 4 in 1, but all the same. This piece starts with 1,5 mm thick rings but the rings seems to get smaller after about 20cm.

It is difficult to tell from the photograph if all rows are made of riveted rings or not. With the rows (left leaning or right leaning) oriented horizontally in your photograph as the normal way in which mail hangs, it appears the mail gets lighter on one side. This might be from the body of a shirt with the lighter mail belonging on the back.

Quote:

Third one is completely different. The rings are large, 14mm in diameter, whole flat and only 1mm thick. This piece is very light.

This again appears to be of demi-riveted construction.

Quote:

last one, thick rings, 11mm in diameter, 4 in 1. Heavy piece.

From the close-up photograph this is also clearly of demi-riveted construction. There appear to be a few missing rivets of round section.

Profile PM

M Hermes

Quote

Posts: 77 Location: The Netherlands

Mon 24 Feb, 2014 12:52 pm

I had a quick look and you are right, it is all demi riveted. Does that mean that it is made in India, the Ottoman empire or Persia?

Profile PM E-mail

M Hermes

Quote

Posts: 77 Location: The Netherlands

Mon 24 Feb, 2014 1:02 pm

Here some close up pictures from the rivets.

Attachment: 153.74 KB
[ Download ]

Attachment: 186.93 KB
[ Download ]

Attachment: 217.31 KB
[ Download ]

Attachment: 170.88 KB
[ Download ]

Attachment: 197.52 KB
[ Download ]

Profile PM E-mail

Mart Shearer

Quote

Posts: 1,303 Location: Jackson, MS, USA

Mon 24 Feb, 2014 1:35 pm

M Hermes wrote:

I had a quick look and you are right, it is all demi riveted. Does that mean that it is made in India, the Ottoman empire or Persia?

Most likely. Demi-riveted construction with round "pin" rivets seems to have been the norm in Europe until the mid-14th century when it appears to have been completely replaced with all riveted construction. Some sources indicate Turkish mail moved to all riveted construction in the 15th century, but Indo-Persian mail seems to have remained demi-riveted into the17th century, eventually being replaced with butted mail. Obviously finding early European mail is a more infrequent occurrence.

The third example seems to have a 90 degree joint (rows change direction) at the lower left of the photo, something usually seen in the armpit.

The second example looks like it might have some expansions at the lower edge of the lighter mail. These might be expansions over the hips, or turned around, contractions over the shoulders. Does Sample #2 have the heavier mail all along the top edge, or is this merely a false impression from the photography?

Thanks for taking such good photographs, as well as taking the time to share.

Profile PM

M Hermes

Quote

Posts: 77 Location: The Netherlands

Mon 24 Feb, 2014 2:00 pm

The second example looks like it might have some expansions at the lower edge of the lighter mail. These might be expansions over the hips, or turned around, contractions over the shoulders. Does Sample #2 have the heavier mail all along the top edge, or is this merely a false impression from the photography?

I'm not sure about the expansions on the lower edge. There are few heavier rings attached to this lower edge . It does have the heavier mail along the top but it seems to get lighter to one corner.

Thanks for your reply!

Profile PM E-mail

Mart Shearer

Quote

Posts: 1,303 Location: Jackson, MS, USA

Mon 24 Feb, 2014 10:33 pm

You may be able to add slightly to the value by identification. Would you rather have a "scrap of mail measuring 30cm x 60cm" or "Left breast and back of an Indo-Persian mail shirt"?

Regarding your second sample: If these are expansions in the red circles, it seems likely the heavier mail on the left side is the left or right breast of a shirt. The outside would have the protruding rivet heads while the inside is relatively flat. The heavier mail at the top would be towards the shoulders. The lighter mail would be on the back, and the expansions over the hips.

The method of expansion probably beginning 10 or 12 rows up from the bottom.
[ Linked Image ]

Attachment: 97.23 KB
Hermes Mail 2.jpg

Profile PM

Robert MacPherson

Quote

Posts: 141 Location: Jeffersonville USA

Tue 25 Feb, 2014 5:48 am

Mart Shearer wrote:

The third example seems to have a 90 degree joint (rows change direction) at the lower left of the photo, something usually seen in the armpit.

Well spotted! (I missed it. :blush: )

Mac

Profile PM Website

Erik D. Schmid

Quote

Posts: 80 Location: St. Cloud, MN

Tue 25 Feb, 2014 7:25 am

Both pieces are of non-European mail. The thicker riveted links are quite worn, but they are in good enough condition to identify them as belonging to a group having a lapped area with a point that faces the inside of the link.

Profile PM Website

Mart Shearer

Quote

Posts: 1,303 Location: Jackson, MS, USA

Tue 25 Feb, 2014 12:03 pm

Upon further information from M. Hermes, it appear that Sample #2 was shown upside down, and my hypothesized hip expansions are actually the contractions over the shoulder blades. The mail is obviously thinner on a vertical line (now on the right side) and also on a line just above the tape measure. This would mean a lighter mail back and skirt, with heavier mail on the chest and shoulders. He has marked the edge of the heavier mail panel using pens. The heavier mail covering half the chest appears to be about 35cm (c.14") deep by 20cm (c.8") wide.

Re-oriented for the proper view:

Attachment: 174.88 KB
Hermes Mail 2.jpg

Attachment: 185.95 KB
Hermes pens (373x500).jpg

Profile PM

Mart Shearer

Quote

Posts: 1,303 Location: Jackson, MS, USA

Tue 25 Feb, 2014 12:16 pm

Erik D. Schmid wrote:

Both pieces are of non-European mail. The thicker riveted links are quite worn, but they are in good enough condition to identify them as belonging to a group having a lapped area with a point that faces the inside of the link.

Erik,
Do you believe that interior point is indicative of non-European origin, or is simply a category? It seems more Persian/Caucasian than Indian in my limited experience.
[ Linked Image ]

Attachment: 118.28 KB
Zaporozhye Museum kolchuga-c.jpg

Profile PM