Thanks to Peter Johnsson, I got access to the museum storage in Uppsala, Sweden. Together with Peter and Eric McHugh, I had a field day. I documented three interesting swords, and there are some lessons to be made from them.

First out, the Ultuna Viking Sword:
This sword was found in a grave in Ultuna, Uppland county, Sweden. It is probably from the 10th century. Inventory number 3459. It is a rather simple weapon. The weight and point of balance ought to indicate a rather blade-heavy sword, but that isn't the case.

Statistics and measurements
Overall length: 928 mm (36.5")
Blade length: 762 mm (30")
Blade width at the base: 56 mm (2.2")
Blade thickness: 6 mm (0.24") at the base, 3.5 mm (0.14") 100 mm from the point
Pommel height: 46 mm (1.8"), width: 82 mm (3.2") (originally c. 85 mm), thickness 35 mm (1.4")
Handle to pommel length: 98 mm (3.9")
Width of guard: 92 mm (3.6"), originally c. 97 mm, thickness 27 mm (1.1")
Point of Balance: 155 mm (6.1") in front of the cross
Weight: 1340 grams (c. 2 lbs 15 oz)

[ Linked Image ]

[ Linked Image ]

The sword is interesting, as it is "heavy". The current fad for very light swords doesn't take into account that there were plenty of swords that weighed slightly more, without getting unwieldy.

Next out is a 13th Century Sword from the Fyris River:
This sword was found in the 19th century together with two others in the banks of Fyris River in Uppsala, Sweden. It was probably forged in the first half of the 13th century. It is a rather large sword and relatively heavy, but it didn't feel unwieldy. The fuller has extensive inscriptions on both sides.

Statistics and measurements
Overall length: 1019 mm (40.1")
Blade length: 843 mm (33.2") (originally probably 875 mm)
Blade width at the base: 50 mm (2")
Blade thickness: 5 mm (0.2") at the base, 2.5 mm (0.1") 100 mm from the point
Fuller length: c. 735 mm, width 17 mm
Pommel height: 54 mm (2.1"), width: 59 mm (2.3"), diameter of inner disc 31 mm (1.2"), thickness 48 mm (1.9"), edge thickness 16 mm (0.6")
Handle to pommel length: 110 mm (4.3")
Width of guard: 210 mm (8.3"), thickness 10.5 x 9 mm (0.4" x 0.35")
Point of Balance: 90 mm (3.5") in front of the cross
Weight: 1628 grams (c. 3 lbs 9 oz)

[ Linked Image ]

Again, a "heavy" sword according to conventional wisdom, but actually quite nice to wield thanks to excellent mass distribution.

Last is another 13th Century Sword from the Fyris River:
This sword was found in the 19th century together with the one above and another sword in the banks of Fyris River in Uppsala, Sweden. It was probably forged in the first half of the 13th century. It is a small, light sword which is very easy to wield. The pommel is octagonal. The fuller has inscriptions in gold inlay on both sides.

Statistics and measurements
Overall length: 895 mm (35.2")
Blade length: 740 mm (29.1")
Blade width at the base: 51 mm (2")
Blade thickness: 5.5 mm (0.2") at the base, 3 mm (0.1") 100 mm from the point
Fuller length: c. 570 mm (22.4"), width 12 mm (0.5")
Pommel height: 35 mm (1.4"), width: 40 mm (1.6")
Handle to pommel length: 110 mm (4.3")
Width of guard: 140 mm (5.5")
Point of Balance: 135 mm (5.3") in front of the cross
Weight: 890 grams (c. 2 lbs)

[ Linked Image ]

[ Linked Image ]

At almost half the weight of the previous sword, this is a lightweight which proves that 13th century swords weren't always the big, chopping blades we've come to expect.

Thanks Bjorn for sharing

Something for everybody there, from the big manly sheering monster, to the lighter very quick sword....

Interesting pommel on sword #3........

Big beefy tang on #3, it looks like

Absolutely fascinating Bjorn. Do you have any more details on the find places of these swords and how they were actually stumbled upon? I'm not going to even try to type the Viking sword but if I was to make a guess I would say that number 2 there is a type X blade (hard to tell without seeing the rest of it) with a type H or I pommel and a type 1 cross. The other also looks like a X to me with a type 1 cross but as Angus says that pommel is a bit of an oddity. I would like to say it was a type T3 but I'm not sure that those were typically faceted. I'd say it's definately a T variant anyway. :) I love this stuff. Anyone have some other ideas?

Beautiful swords! The last one reminds me of the Solingen Sword in Albion's Peter Johnsson collection; were there any similarities between the two?

Thanks for the stats Bjorn :) When I looked at the shape of the blade the first thing that popped into my head was "Hey, that looks like the Solingen!" The stats defintely show a difference in overall mass. Just out of curiosity I played around with the number a little, basically comparing the ratio between overall length vs. blade length, and I did find something interesting; the ratios were not far off from one another, with the Solingen ration at approximately 1.20 and the Fyris #2 ratio at 1.21. Maybe this explains why the COG's are so close? Even though the overall mass differs between the two, perhaps it's distributed in a very similar way?

I think you're right Robert. I also feel that this is a prime example of how medieval european sword manufacture was much more developed than commonly believed. Here we have two swords of different sizes, yet they're very similar in their common distribution. There were obviously principals and fundamentals in sword construction that were understood and followed as common course. Far from the common view of "Let's bang it out and see what happens".

You are right of course Bjorn but I have this overwhelming urge to try to categorize these things by typology. Okay so I'm a simple guy with simple amusments. :)

As you say Angus you merely said it was interesting. Okay fine I will say it's a bit of an oddity. :)

Honestly I think a book of stories about how swords were found and by who would be totally fascinating. Sort of a history detective book.