Hello,
I'm looking for information on sword suspension, either belts or baldrics, from the 11th century especially circa 1066-1070. I'm particularly interested in English/Saxon, Irish, and Norman suspensions.
I was thinking the typical Norman/Crusader suspension with the laced scabbard would be appropriate, wie so. However, I'm a ltitle confused by what time periods it is actually appropriate for. That Albion page says 10th to 11th century; previously I'd thought it was more 11th-13th; yesterday I saw (although I cannot recall where) an implication that it came into fashion more in the 12th century. Also, I'm a little intimidated by the thought of trying to lace my own, and I can't afford to purchase one.
As far as Saxon and Irish, I have no idea.
For Viking, I found these two threads: http://www.myArmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t=12131 & http://www.myArmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t=18104
They seem pretty in-depth and unless there are some pressing issues I should know I think I'm satisfied.
On a more experimental note, I'm also wondering what might be done for a Welsh scabbard suspension of the same period. I'm sure I could get away with using whatever a Saxon or Viking style, but I'd like something more distinctive. Perhaps borrowing from an Irish source? Then again perhaps the Irish would at this point have something fairly nordic themselves.
I am almost tempted to use a Roman sort of baldric with four scabbard rings and a single split-end baldric. But that's far too anachronistic for my taste I think.
Any help I can get is welcome!
Cheers,
Pete
The 11th C is period that seems to be the transition point away from the Carolingian/Viking style into the later "integral" style suspensions.
The only examples surviving from the 11th C that I am personally aware of are some scabbard leathers from York that clearly show piercing in the leather as was used in some form of "integral" belts.
Other than that we have artwork from the period.
[ Linked Image ]
The type labeled "18" and variations of it shows up fairly often, and I believe it is the artistic depiction of the standard X style "integral" belt
The only examples surviving from the 11th C that I am personally aware of are some scabbard leathers from York that clearly show piercing in the leather as was used in some form of "integral" belts.
Other than that we have artwork from the period.
[ Linked Image ]
The type labeled "18" and variations of it shows up fairly often, and I believe it is the artistic depiction of the standard X style "integral" belt
I'm having trouble interpreting those illustrations. But that does help, thank you.
So things like strap bridges and rings are probably out?
For the Welsh scabbard, on the other hand, perhaps a slightly outdated method would be acceptable. Wales seems to have often been a little behind the fashion curve, from what I understand.
Ooh. Do you have any links for these? I would love to see them.
Robin Smith wrote: |
The 11th C is period that seems to be the transition point away from the Carolingian/Viking style into the later "integral" style suspensions. |
So things like strap bridges and rings are probably out?
For the Welsh scabbard, on the other hand, perhaps a slightly outdated method would be acceptable. Wales seems to have often been a little behind the fashion curve, from what I understand.
Robin Smith wrote: |
The only examples surviving from the 11th C that I am personally aware of are some scabbard leathers from York that clearly show piercing in the leather as was used in some form of "integral" belts. |
Ooh. Do you have any links for these? I would love to see them.
Seeing that image you posted, it occurred to me to do another Google search... this time in German :)
I found this:
http://www.reenactment.de/reenactment_start/r...heide.html
I found this:
http://www.reenactment.de/reenactment_start/r...heide.html
That's a useful page, Peter. There's an image in the Roda Bible (1050-1100) as well, but it is lacking in detail. The central lower figure's belt seems to be even, rather than offset, on both sides of the scabbard.
http://manuscriptminiatures.com/biblia-sancti...atin/6641/
[ Linked Image ]
Although this miniature is from c. 1175, it seems to give a more detailed view of the "Type 18" suspension system. Perhaps there was some attempt to give Goliath antiquated or obsolescent equipment to enhance his "foreignness".
http://manuscriptminiatures.com/bible-kb-76-e-11/4500/
[ Linked Image ]
http://manuscriptminiatures.com/biblia-sancti...atin/6641/
[ Linked Image ]
Although this miniature is from c. 1175, it seems to give a more detailed view of the "Type 18" suspension system. Perhaps there was some attempt to give Goliath antiquated or obsolescent equipment to enhance his "foreignness".
http://manuscriptminiatures.com/bible-kb-76-e-11/4500/
[ Linked Image ]
That's excellent, Mark! Thank you. The belt setup on Goliath is really interesting... it does have the typical crossed X lacing, but the belt is at the same level on both sides, and actually looks like a continuous loop going through a single surface slit, unless I'm reading that wrong.
Anyway, great finds. I think I'm going to tag those with "sword suspension" for future searches.
In the meantime, I've just finished this sketch based on the German scabbard (for the Saxon) the standard Norman laced scabbard (for the Norman...) and a rather archaic but simple suspension from the ninth century as in that illustration there (for the Welsh) with an alternate idea that's based on the vertical strap bridge/slider suspension here without the strap bridge.
[ Linked Image ]
(the pic links through to a larger version)
Thoughts?
Anyway, great finds. I think I'm going to tag those with "sword suspension" for future searches.
In the meantime, I've just finished this sketch based on the German scabbard (for the Saxon) the standard Norman laced scabbard (for the Norman...) and a rather archaic but simple suspension from the ninth century as in that illustration there (for the Welsh) with an alternate idea that's based on the vertical strap bridge/slider suspension here without the strap bridge.
[ Linked Image ]
(the pic links through to a larger version)
Thoughts?
Nicely done Peter! I'll take one of each please! ;)
Peter Anderson wrote: |
The belt setup on Goliath is really interesting... it does have the typical crossed X lacing, but the belt is at the same level on both sides, and actually looks like a continuous loop going through a single surface slit, unless I'm reading that wrong. |
Perhaps it's one long continuous belt through 8 slits, 2 front and 6 back?
Front
(F1) (F2)
(B1) (B2)
(B3) (B4)
(B5) (B6)
Belt enters F1, wraps internally and exits B1
Belt crosses externally downward diagonally from B1 to B4 and re-enters
Belt wraps internally and exits B5, wrapping horizontally on the outside and re-enters B6
Belt wraps internally and exits B3
Belt wraps externally upward diagonally from B3 to B2 and re-enters
Belt wraps internally and exits F2
Of course, I could be reading it wrong as well!
Ah, nice one, Mark! Hard to say if that's what it is, but I should certainly think that would work. Well figured. I'm half tempted to try that for the Norman, just to be different...
Thanks Tim! So would I. :D
Thanks Tim! So would I. :D
Page 1 of 1
You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum