based on the well-known St Maurice from Magdeburg (mid-13th Century)...
[ Linked Image ]
I'm making a leather "surcoat" reinforced with steel plates (1,5 mm) on the torso
I'm using solid brass rivets and home-made leather washers
pics coming asap :D
a view from the inside, just two plates attached for now (5 x 12 cm)
Attachment: 75.19 KB
Attachment: 75.19 KB
as seen from the front side, the steel washer was necessary to avoid the rivet head cutting into the leather
Attachment: 51.92 KB
Attachment: 51.92 KB
still work in progress but you can catch the overall thing
Attachment: 55.51 KB
Attachment: 55.51 KB
Not to undermine your project at all, which is looking very nice by the way!
But I had thought that the plates overlapped? Perhaps not always?
But I had thought that the plates overlapped? Perhaps not always?
thanks Matthew
no mining at all, comments and critics are welcome
at the best of my knowledge I have no access to original findings to look the inner side, so I guess it's a matter of speculation
since it's a very early stage of plates usage for armour I thought it would be (perhaps) more accurate a simple side by side assembly
overlapping plates implies they are capable of moving as an articulated piece of armour, this would be far too technological for the second half of 13 C.
this is only my opinion though ;)
no mining at all, comments and critics are welcome
at the best of my knowledge I have no access to original findings to look the inner side, so I guess it's a matter of speculation
since it's a very early stage of plates usage for armour I thought it would be (perhaps) more accurate a simple side by side assembly
overlapping plates implies they are capable of moving as an articulated piece of armour, this would be far too technological for the second half of 13 C.
this is only my opinion though ;)
Serarch for the book :
Armour from the Battle of Wisby 1361. Vol. I, Vol. II
There you will find a lot of C.O.P.'s with detailed description and images.
Armour from the Battle of Wisby 1361. Vol. I, Vol. II
There you will find a lot of C.O.P.'s with detailed description and images.
Hi,
Wisby plates are known to me but there about 100 years in the middle
Wisby plates are known to me but there about 100 years in the middle
Roberto Banfi wrote: |
since it's a very early stage of plates usage for armour I thought it would be (perhaps) more accurate a simple side by side assembly |
in addition this is the "Sleeping Guard" of the Holy Sepulchre, German late 13th Century
I spot three rows of non overlapping rectangular plates with four rivets each
Attachment: 233.77 KB
It is very rare for these types of armours to not have overlapping plates. The protective capacity drops considerably if they don't overlap. The sleeping guard is one of the few examples that appear to show non-overlapping plates but there are plenty of reasons why this may not have been the case in reality.
I can assume that protective capability drops particularly against thrusts since an acute point could find its way into the cloth /leather gaps between metal plates
I am no expert in 15th C. but brigandines aren't made of many small not overlapping plates, are they?
I am no expert in 15th C. but brigandines aren't made of many small not overlapping plates, are they?
update... only four plates missing on 2nd and 3rd row; I left a little room for side stitchings for which I was drilling holes in advance
Attachment: 198.45 KB
[ Download ]
Attachment: 198.45 KB
[ Download ]
Roberto Banfi wrote: |
I am no expert in 15th C. but brigandines aren't made of many small not overlapping plates, are they? |
They overlap. See here: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...iew%29.JPG
If the plates overlap they also transfer the force from a blow over multiple plates.
withs give a lower impact to the wearer or at least a bigger transfer area.
withs give a lower impact to the wearer or at least a bigger transfer area.
A long time ago, I constructed a CoP based on that sleeping guard statuette, almost exactly like the one the threadposter is making now, only using linen instead of leather (and leaving off the long flaps); when worn the non-overlapping plates still rest against each other, and part of the force of a blow is transferred around the body of the wearer. At least, that is my experience (when worn over a gambeson and maille)
Doesn't tell us anything without a comparative analysis. How much better would it have performed if the plates overlapped?
ive heard the 'sleeping guard' 'COP' as being described in one book of mine as a reinforced surcoat and one could say that its an exmple of the step BEFORE the full blown coat of plates just as a way of adding something solid to go in front of the rest of the armour
remember that russian kolontars and japanese tatami dou consisted of non overlapping plates within a maile matrix instead id imagine this reinforced surcoat would go over the mail hauberk.
remember that russian kolontars and japanese tatami dou consisted of non overlapping plates within a maile matrix instead id imagine this reinforced surcoat would go over the mail hauberk.
Colt Reeves wrote: | ||
They overlap. See here: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...iew%29.JPG |
thanks ;) I'm gonna keep that in mind
Roberto Banfi wrote: |
Hi,
Wisby plates are known to me but there about 100 years in the middle |
Although the Wisby coat-of-plates were being used in the 1360's, they probably represent armour technology of the 1280-1320 period. By 1340, effigies and art commonly show more developed CoP designs which cover the hips and have a waisted profile.
(Remember the Wisby armour was being used by a desperate, poorly equipped militia in the armour-backwater of Europe, not a good place to look for the latest armour designs.)
There is nothing technologically complex about overlapping plates, regardless of the time period. I would assume it was done from the very beginning.
Jojo Zerach wrote: |
Although the Wisby coat-of-plates were being used in the 1360's, they probably represent armour technology of the 1280-1320 period. By 1340, effigies and art commonly show more developed CoP designs which cover the hips and have a waisted profile. (Remember the Wisby armour was being used by a desperate, poorly equipped militia in the armour-backwater of Europe, not a good place to look for the latest armour designs.) There is nothing technologically complex about overlapping plates, regardless of the time period. I would assume it was done from the very beginning. |
I doubt that Wisby-style CoPs were worn by warriors during for example the Battle of Campaldino (Italy, Tuscany - 1290) or Courtrai (Belgium, 1302) even if some elbow or knee cops were quite developed for the time; I can accept that a battlefield boasts a decade or two of weapons and armours but without findings or adequate documentation I stick to my point.
I love Wisby harness BTW ;)
Page 1 of 2
You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum