Posts: 11 Location: Gothenburg, Sweden.
Wed 11 Jul, 2012 6:15 am
Any basis in reality of these Sipahi?
Hi there.
I found this interesting picture of two sipahis whilst browsing around the internet earlier today, they appear to be wearing a mix of eastern clothing and armour with western armour. Just as the topic says, is there any basis in reality for these sipahi wearing that kind of mix of armours as in the depiction?
Attachment: 91.33 KB

Posts: 54 Location: Netherlands
Thu 12 Jul, 2012 1:11 am
sipahi
It could verywell be that these soldiers were in fact polish or hungarian
hussars. They adopted a lot of armour from the ottoman Turks. It is hard to say because the ottomans also adopted armour from the west. I think it is very well possible.
Posts: 2,698 Location: Indonesia
Thu 12 Jul, 2012 1:13 am
Any information on the date and origin of the illustration itself?
Posts: 11 Location: Gothenburg, Sweden.
Thu 12 Jul, 2012 4:19 am
Sorry no idea where/when the book comes from, it's german by the looks of it as it says "Sipahis, söldner des Sultans" at the bottom left of it.
Posts: 1,420 Location: New Orleans
Thu 12 Jul, 2012 7:15 am
Those are probably at least somewhat accurate, I've seen that image before though I don't remember the source either.
There were at least two distinct types of Sipahi, one type recruited from the Balkans (Rumeli) had more European kit, the other from Anatolia and Central Asia more Turkish kit. The latter were principally horse-archers while the former were more like heavy cavalry.
J
Posts: 11 Location: Gothenburg, Sweden.
Thu 12 Jul, 2012 3:38 pm
Thank you Jean. I too assumed they were from the Balkans, it was the only logical conclusion I could make. Perhaps there is some reality to it after all.
Posts: 2,698 Location: Indonesia
Wed 25 Jul, 2012 10:44 pm
I'd still like to know the date and provenance of the illustration, since it seems a bit suspect; the armour depicted there indicates a late 15th-century or early 16th-century date but the colour palette of the illustration just seems wrong somehow for that date (and resembles 18th-century illustrations instead). This makes me wonder if the illustration has been redrawn from an earlier, uncoloured original, in which case some (potentially serious) errors could have crept in during the copying process.
You
cannot post new topics in this forum
You
cannot reply to topics in this forum
You
cannot edit your posts in this forum
You
cannot delete your posts in this forum
You
cannot vote in polls in this forum
You
cannot attach files in this forum
You
can download files in this forum