Help needed with translation.
First of all hello every one, I am new to this site and seeking some of your professional help.

My father found an old sword in Russia few month a go. It looks like a broad sword but don't quote me on that. The sword is in quiet good condition and it has some inscription on it. The lettering on it is very similar to German type of lettering.
I don't have a picture because I live in UK and my dad lives in Russia. I will try and get a picture up.

From what I can see it has three words something like that:-

1. ''Dora'' or ''Dors''
2. ''Shat''
3. ''Duoenteat'' or ''duoentest'' or ''duoentear''

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
So if your father can`t read it its obviously not russian.
how old is the sword perhaps ?
maybe this is some long gone language, varangian/rus or something...
When you say "German type of lettering", do you mean gothic letters?
Simon G. wrote:
When you say "German type of lettering", do you mean gothic letters?


Yes Simon, Gothic type. We recon it about 800 years old. Dad has few swords in his collection, so he is more clued up on that topic. It just the inscription we cant make out. I will try and get pictures of it.
Victor,

Pictures would be most helpful. I can probably help. Those words could be Germanic, but it is possible that the 'h' only looks like an 'h' but is perhaps something else. It could be Latin. The Dora could be Dona as in a gift.

Pictures really are crucial because the same kinds of writing - Gothic/Miniscule - were used for different languages.

Danielle
My dad made a copy of the inscription, as best as he could. I managed to get photos over Skype. Sorry for the image quality. 1st picture contains 1st and 2nd word of the blade inscription, and the 2nd picture has the last word of the inscription. I will try and get picture of the sword over the next few days. Thanks for every ones help so far.


 Attachment: 87.09 KB
1st & 2nd Incription.png


 Attachment: 85.33 KB
3rd Incription.png

Very helpful, Victor!

I am pretty sure this is Latin. I think that first word is fors as in 'fortune' or 'luck'.

I am not sure what that symbol in front of hat is. It could be an abbreviation symbol, which seems unlikely for a sword. It could be an s as you thought, or it could be an i or a j.

The bottom word looks like duoentest. I don't know what this would mean other than that 'double' is probably part of the word. I have tried breaking it into duo en test and duo entest. I'm not sure. It is probably something obvious.

The font does not look old enough for Old French. How old did you say this sword is?

Danielle
Hi,
could it be Latin?
Fors (gate)
..at
Audent (they dare, they're eager for battle)
or
Augent (they increase)
est
Well, it makes no sense like that but I've not learnt much Latin during my school years :blush:
P.S.
I've just seen Danielle's message, could it be something with the meaning of "Fortes fortuna juvat " or " audentes fortuna iuvat" : fortune favors the bold
I've got it:
fors juvat audentes: fortune favors the brave (Claudian) !
Stephane Rabier wrote:
I've got it:
fors juvat audentes: fortune favors the brave (Claudian) !


That would be a very corrupted version of the Latin, some letters are even missing.

Could we possibly have an image of the whole sword?
Danielle Skjelver wrote:
Very helpful, Victor!

I am pretty sure this is Latin. I think that first word is fors as in 'fortune' or 'luck'.

I am not sure what that symbol in front of hat is. It could be an abbreviation symbol, which seems unlikely for a sword. It could be an s as you thought, or it could be an i or a j.

The bottom word looks like duoentest. I don't know what this would mean other than that 'double' is probably part of the word. I have tried breaking it into duo en test and duo entest. I'm not sure. It is probably something obvious.

The font does not look old enough for Old French. How old did you say this sword is?

Danielle


Thanks Danielle for your help and every one involved. Regarding swords age my dad thinks its about 800 years old. I will try to get an image of the whole sword may be tomorrow or day after when I get to speak to dad. Thanks Victor
Kurt Scholz wrote:

That would be a very corrupted version of the Latin, some letters are even missing.

Could we possibly have an image of the whole sword?

Hi,
I'd like to see a photograph of the sword too!
Corrupted, I don't know but I guess the top parts of the letter must be partly erased so it's easy to take a "a" for a "d" or a "d" for a "o".
The last "t" could just be a final cross, an exclamation mark, etc. depending on the period.

The" juvat" or "IVVAT" word written "jhat" puzzles me more. If Victor's father didn't miss one letter, I can't imagine a "w" being taken for a "h" but the wynn letter used in England until the XIVth century looks exactly that way.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wynn
I'm far from being a specialist of old English inscriptions, does anyone know if it could have been used in a Latin motto?
Here's some pics of the sword.


 Attachment: 124.57 KB
Sword whole.png


 Attachment: 117.34 KB
sword front.png


 Attachment: 119.76 KB
sword centre.png


 Attachment: 128.63 KB
Video call snapshot 8.png


 Attachment: 109.51 KB
sword pic.png
This is picture from the postcard that is similar to dads sword
Your images don't show the pommel. Can you add this?
Is it possible to have a photography where you can see the inscription on the sword? Part of the deciphering was done under the assumption that the inscription has been damaged and thus letters are corrupted. It probably helps to use sunlight and no flash while taking the photography.
Kurt Scholz wrote:
Your images don't show the pommel. Can you add this?
Is it possible to have a photography where you can see the inscription on the sword? Part of the deciphering was done under the assumption that the inscription has been damaged and thus letters are corrupted. It probably helps to use sunlight and no flash while taking the photography.


I know what you mean regarding the image. I have asked my dad to take a proper image on digital camera. Hopefully I will have that in the next few days.
Hi,
any news from your dad's camera Victor?
iam very sure that this thing is an DUD
first the inscibtion does not suit from the style the looks of this sword.from the looks its about 1200 but the inscribtions where not made that style at this date.surely an fake or victorian copy
this is an victorian copy made look older with acid or other suff the grey look is typic.das the advantage no patination is on it....very typic for an dud.
iam very sure about this even the pics are not good.
anyway what others say after 25 years in the thing i say not good
Yes sorry just been busy. Below are some pictures that my dad took, close up of the sword.


 Attachment: 69.63 KB
[ Download ]

 Attachment: 104.06 KB
[ Download ]

 Attachment: 121.42 KB
[ Download ]

 Attachment: 116.98 KB
[ Download ]

 Attachment: 83.35 KB
[ Download ]

 Attachment: 92.5 KB
[ Download ]
DUD as i say.the lettering has the same look like the one on an SS OR SA DAGGER.never is this the work of the 12.century.
this is as clear as rain.its this romatic lettering which is in the historism oftenm used.
its an fake or an historism item but never this sword is original
no one would spoil an original sword with this lettering.
inscribtions on swords of 1200 look totally different.this is etched.at this early date the leters where cut,and when one cuts this capitals they are never so wide.this can only made with etching.and this was not done around 1200.

Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum




All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum