I am doing some research and I wondering if anyone could help me out. Does anyone
have any accounts on the use of poison with knives, swords or any other such weapons
during the Middle ages? Any info would be much appreciated.
Thanks
Greek Fire, Poison Arrows & Scorpion Bombs: Biological and Chemical Warfare in the Ancient World by Adrienne Mayor is a good start.
using trebuchet to hurl dead animals into your oponent's fortification to cause disease. There is a depiction of this in an illumination which will now bug me until I find it again.
In Hamlet, poisoned blades are used in the duel... written ~1600
In Hamlet, poisoned blades are used in the duel... written ~1600
Greetings! Once I saw the performance of a re-enactment group, who mentioned that in the times of the Turkish wars in Hungary (ca. 1526 to 1686) in duels the judges had to lick the blades of the competitor to assure that they were not poisoned. I hope I was able to help, altough I can't tell any period source describing the process of dueling.
John
John
János Sibinger wrote: |
Greetings! Once I saw the performance of a re-enactment group, who mentioned that in the times of the Turkish wars in Hungary (ca. 1526 to 1686) in duels the judges had to lick the blades of the competitor to assure that they were not poisoned. I hope I was able to help, altough I can't tell any period source describing the process of dueling.
John |
that rather sounds.... stupid.
would'nt it be more sensible to have ruled that each competitor had to lick thier own blade?
or were judges really unpopular?
Depending on where you are considering for your research.
China had a repeating crossbow and reportedly the bolts were dipped in poison as the crossbow lacked penetrating power. I am no scholar so the further research is on you.
http://www.atarn.org/chinese/rept_xbow.htm
http://www.chinahistoryforum.com/index.php?/t...ge__st__15
Poison acts relatively slowly, so are you interested in assassinations or just battlefield applications?
China had a repeating crossbow and reportedly the bolts were dipped in poison as the crossbow lacked penetrating power. I am no scholar so the further research is on you.
http://www.atarn.org/chinese/rept_xbow.htm
http://www.chinahistoryforum.com/index.php?/t...ge__st__15
Poison acts relatively slowly, so are you interested in assassinations or just battlefield applications?
Quote: |
that rather sounds.... stupid.
would'nt it be more sensible to have ruled that each competitor had to lick thier own blade? |
Indeed! :D
Thats why I wrote that I can't mention any historical evidence about this process.
But a good point there! :)
John
Hi,
maybe the goal of licking the blade was not to get poisoned (some poisons like curare are not toxic if eaten) but to taste if there was something else than oil on the metal surface ;)
maybe the goal of licking the blade was not to get poisoned (some poisons like curare are not toxic if eaten) but to taste if there was something else than oil on the metal surface ;)
Hi,
another good point, Stephan! That seems logical for me...
another good point, Stephan! That seems logical for me...
Hello all,
I recall reading somewhere that the archers in the English armies that fought the French in the 100 Years War etc, used to stick their arrows in the ground ready for use in the coming battle.
It was suggested that, whilst not necessarily being done on purpose, that the arrowheads would / could be contaminated by whatever was in the soil, leading to infected wounds.
I would surmise that if the ground had been used for animal grazing then faecal matter could have been introduced to any arrow wound. With medical care being limited in those days [especially scarce to those of the lower orders?] then injured soldiers could succub to "poisoning".
Food for thought...
Cheers,
M
I recall reading somewhere that the archers in the English armies that fought the French in the 100 Years War etc, used to stick their arrows in the ground ready for use in the coming battle.
It was suggested that, whilst not necessarily being done on purpose, that the arrowheads would / could be contaminated by whatever was in the soil, leading to infected wounds.
I would surmise that if the ground had been used for animal grazing then faecal matter could have been introduced to any arrow wound. With medical care being limited in those days [especially scarce to those of the lower orders?] then injured soldiers could succub to "poisoning".
Food for thought...
Cheers,
M
Thank you all very much for for the info. :)
With regards to judges licking the blades, I think it may have been more of a way to discourage xheating then to actualy catch a cheater. After all, if you're already in a judical duel and then your weapon goes and posions the judge, I'm pretty sure they wouldn't look kindly on it.
Oh, and poision wise on weapons, I know in the Amazon they use the venom from a frog. And if you're patient just use lead and mercury! :lol:
But yeah, I'd be more concerned about dying of an infection from a stubbed toe then being intentionaly poisoned.
Oh, and poision wise on weapons, I know in the Amazon they use the venom from a frog. And if you're patient just use lead and mercury! :lol:
But yeah, I'd be more concerned about dying of an infection from a stubbed toe then being intentionaly poisoned.
There is a reference from some crossbow book and I am pretty sure it is Payne Gallweys one, that says the Spanish used to poison their bolts for hunting with a boiled concoction of either deadly nightshade or henbane ( I forget) but that whatever the plant is, it is called 'the crossbowmans herb' in spanish.
The claim was that when struck, a beast would drop in 20-30 paces, so pretty potent stuff.
Tod
The claim was that when struck, a beast would drop in 20-30 paces, so pretty potent stuff.
Tod
I remember watching a show once called mind, body and kickass moves, which was about various martial arts from around the world, and when the host went to the Phillopeans (sp?) he saw a bladesmith who use poisonous spiders to poison his blades. He did this by placing the spiders on the blade and heating it over a fire. I have always wondered about this as it seems to me that any poisonous coating given to a blade would just wear or wash off. Does anybody know if this treatment of a blade could bestow any long-term poison, or do you think that it would have to be re-applied on a regular basis?
Page 1 of 1
You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum