Hi,
does anyone know when exactly the first plumbatae were used? For I have heard that they were actually developped by the Greeks and that the Romans adopted them afterwards. Others say that it was developped by the Romans in the 3rd - 4th century AD.
Thanks in advance!
Hi Patrick
Development in the fourth century.
The literary sources are scarce.
Talk about it, Vegetius, ( II, 15, 16, III, 14). In use by the light infantry
In De Rebus Bellicis (10.11) describes 2 types of Plumbata:
"Plumbata Mamillata" normal
"Plumbata tribolata", with three spikes protruding from leaden weight of which was equipped with the plumb.
The Plumbata was in use until the sixth century, yet, Maurizio mentions in Strategikon. (XII, II, 2)
Developed by the Greeks? From these sources is not.
Attachment: 87.29 KB
Development in the fourth century.
The literary sources are scarce.
Talk about it, Vegetius, ( II, 15, 16, III, 14). In use by the light infantry
In De Rebus Bellicis (10.11) describes 2 types of Plumbata:
"Plumbata Mamillata" normal
"Plumbata tribolata", with three spikes protruding from leaden weight of which was equipped with the plumb.
The Plumbata was in use until the sixth century, yet, Maurizio mentions in Strategikon. (XII, II, 2)
Developed by the Greeks? From these sources is not.
Attachment: 87.29 KB
Vegetius reckons that it was developed late 3rd century. Alternate name is martiobarbuli. Some tetrarchic legions are noted for being skilled with this weapon.
This has some useful info
http://www.romanarmytalk.com/rat/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=1689
This has some useful info
http://www.romanarmytalk.com/rat/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=1689
Dan Howard wrote: |
Vegetius reckons that it was developed late 3rd century. Alternate name is martiobarbuli. Some tetrarchic legions are noted for being skilled with this weapon.
This has some useful info http://www.romanarmytalk.com/rat/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=1689 |
I want to add
"Mattiobarbuli" were the two legions of soldiers to 6,000 troops stationed in Illyricum , they were very skillful in the use of these weapons. They used to bring into the shield 5 Mattiobarbuli, their range was about 70-80 meters.
From these, this word has broadened its meaning.
A support for the archers. Late imperial army is preparing for large changes in the sixth century.
How do I use those things? Do I toss it like a dart for a dart board, or is there some kind of launcher?
M.
M.
M. Eversberg II wrote: |
How do I use those things? Do I toss it like a dart for a dart board, or is there some kind of launcher?
M. |
could kill.
Attachment: 120.42 KB
ya, think lawn darts :)
they do serious damage to on coming horses
they do serious damage to on coming horses
Ah yes, lawn darts. That was a -fantastic- idea for a child's toy, wasn't it :p
Thanks for the image though. Oddly had the notion that you tried to play darts with the enemy army as your target board. I'm assuming those spiked ones acted as long distance on-demand caltdrops too...pretty ingenious!
M.
Thanks for the image though. Oddly had the notion that you tried to play darts with the enemy army as your target board. I'm assuming those spiked ones acted as long distance on-demand caltdrops too...pretty ingenious!
M.
Chuck Russell wrote: |
ya, think lawn darts :)
they do serious damage to on coming horses |
"Plumbata" falling without hitting a target, in ground, could hurt their feet.
Units were light infantry and skirmishers to annoy the enemy, encouraging an early attack and disorganized.
Heavy infantry opened the gates, which were shut as soon as they came back.
Often enemies were raging, violent, fearless, but little tactical.
An important point (hehehe) of this missile weapon is that it's parabolical. Combine them with a few archers in almost horizontal shooting (50-80 meters) and the enemy must choose what weapon will stop with his shield...and thus being vulnerable to the another ...
Of course, an organized enemy can solve this with a good array of shields.
Of course, an organized enemy can solve this with a good array of shields.
In a recent book about roman army, written by Cascarino, there's a pretty good description of plumbatae, but i saw Maurizio have already posted a few images from the book. I think the effective range was probably 50m and it's almost sure Plumbatae didn't came from greek warfare.
Iagoba Ferreira wrote: |
An important point (hehehe) of this missile weapon is that it's parabolical. |
I knew this
Iagoba Ferreira wrote: |
Combine them with a few archers in almost horizontal shooting (50-80 meters) and the enemy must choose what weapon will stop with his shield...and thus being vulnerable to the another ... |
I never thought of this. Very interesting
Gabriele C. wrote: |
In a recent book about roman army, written by Cascarino, there's a pretty good description of plumbatae, but i saw Maurizio have already posted a few images from the book. I think the effective range was probably 50m and it's almost sure Plumbatae didn't came from greek warfare. |
Ave Gabriele,
you are right, the title is Esercito Romano by Cascarino. Also Strategikon is by Cascarino.
I think 50 meters more real, maybe just the two famous legions pulled so far, have remained popular to this.
Page 1 of 1
You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum