Posts: 630 Location: Tucson
Thu 04 Mar, 2010 12:56 pm
I don't think weight is the issue at all either.
If the question is why complex hilts didn't develop earlier - I think the answer probably lies within the quality of steel developing over time, as well as mechanization of foundries, development of tools, and ways to shape steel. There is a bit of a parallel to plate armour in that complex hilts show up in the late 15th c coincident to more highly formed plate armour. Also the earliest complex hilts seem to show up at the same time that many other more complex weapons like flanged maces, warhammers and other complex polearms start to become prevalent. Anyone who owns an A&A high gothic mace knows how relatively complex that weapon is for one example. So I think this points to development of technology.
If the question is why basket hilts (and
schiavona) took longer to develop than rapier hilts or complex bastard sword hilts I suspect Bill is onto something as basket hilts tend to require much more welding than most rapier hilts. If you look at the earliest baskethilts pictured in Mazansky, i.e. Mary Rose time frame, or the earliest Germanic baskethilts, they are primarily comprised of many rounded bars welded up into a basket.
Its a very interesting question. tr