I was thinking that we need a thread on sword suspensions. I mean we have threads for practically everything else I have not seen one specifically on this.
I often find myself wondering at the suspensions and their related accouterments more than the actual weapons. So any care to post pics or your sword belts and suspensions. Any period, any place.
Use the search funtion. There are several posts per week on the subject.
Regards,
/Ville
Regards,
/Ville
My first scabbard/supension (only a few months old as of this writing) is typically Austrian, ca. 1480-1525. I have a similar project underway now. It's worth noting that suspensions and scabbards were subject to regional tastes. You could pair an historical scabbard with an historical suspension and still come up with something a-historical if you're not careful. That's one of the many reasons I look at artwork of the period for ideas and justification.
With so many people making scabbards these days I'm surprised so few folks are also making chappes (a.k.a., "rain guards,") which art-historical evidence suggests were an integral part of the scabbard/suspension system of many or most late-medieval swords (in Northern Europe, at least). I've said elsewhere here that the properly-fit tubular chappe helps retain the sword in the scabbard, just as the construction of the scabbard itself and suspension do.
Even if these devices were primarily defensive, as some have argued, artwork and surviving examples reveal that the tubular style shown here was carefully fit to the scabbard mouth, which is tricky to manage, let me tell you. :D For the chappe to fit properly, you have to make the scabbard first, complete with the horizontal riser where the chappe will end. That's more than an aesthetic decision, though, because that riser also serves to prevent the suspension knot from moving up when only a single knot is used. So, in theory, you need an assembled sword in the scabbard so you can fine-tune the balance by the placement of that riser. But you can't secure the hilt until you make the chappe, which in at least some cases sits under or around the base of the grip and is stitched in place. And you can't include a chappe in the rough assembly because until you have the sword in the scabbard you won't know exactly where the riser should be, and if you don't know where the riser should be you have no idea how long the chappe needs to be anyway! I haven't measured to see how much difference one half-inch might make in the placement of the riser (historic tubular chappe lengths appear to vary by approx. .75") , but it should have some effect on the angle of the sword when worn.
I'm making scabbards, but I don't consider myself a proper scabbard maker. I find the work to be much more challenging and exacting than the basic sword cutlery I'm doing. I think I had to take apart my current project three times to refine the fit. If you've ever wondered about the $1,000+ price of custom historical scabbards, all I can say is, "try it".
:lol:
Attachment: 129.92 KB
Attachment: 214 KB
With so many people making scabbards these days I'm surprised so few folks are also making chappes (a.k.a., "rain guards,") which art-historical evidence suggests were an integral part of the scabbard/suspension system of many or most late-medieval swords (in Northern Europe, at least). I've said elsewhere here that the properly-fit tubular chappe helps retain the sword in the scabbard, just as the construction of the scabbard itself and suspension do.
Even if these devices were primarily defensive, as some have argued, artwork and surviving examples reveal that the tubular style shown here was carefully fit to the scabbard mouth, which is tricky to manage, let me tell you. :D For the chappe to fit properly, you have to make the scabbard first, complete with the horizontal riser where the chappe will end. That's more than an aesthetic decision, though, because that riser also serves to prevent the suspension knot from moving up when only a single knot is used. So, in theory, you need an assembled sword in the scabbard so you can fine-tune the balance by the placement of that riser. But you can't secure the hilt until you make the chappe, which in at least some cases sits under or around the base of the grip and is stitched in place. And you can't include a chappe in the rough assembly because until you have the sword in the scabbard you won't know exactly where the riser should be, and if you don't know where the riser should be you have no idea how long the chappe needs to be anyway! I haven't measured to see how much difference one half-inch might make in the placement of the riser (historic tubular chappe lengths appear to vary by approx. .75") , but it should have some effect on the angle of the sword when worn.
I'm making scabbards, but I don't consider myself a proper scabbard maker. I find the work to be much more challenging and exacting than the basic sword cutlery I'm doing. I think I had to take apart my current project three times to refine the fit. If you've ever wondered about the $1,000+ price of custom historical scabbards, all I can say is, "try it".
:lol:
Attachment: 129.92 KB
Attachment: 214 KB
Here are some historical examples, mostly Austrian, late 15th, early 16th c.
Attachment: 123.02 KB
Attachment: 144.6 KB
Attachment: 174.4 KB
Attachment: 211.35 KB
Attachment: 176.18 KB
Attachment: 146.92 KB
Attachment: 97.5 KB
Attachment: 188.28 KB
Attachment: 123.02 KB
Attachment: 144.6 KB
Attachment: 174.4 KB
Attachment: 211.35 KB
Attachment: 176.18 KB
Attachment: 146.92 KB
Attachment: 97.5 KB
Attachment: 188.28 KB
Here a few more. Notice the trend here--narrow belts and single knots, no matter the size of the sword. In other words, the complete suspension is nothing more than a long, narrow belt and simple buckle. The last two images below makes the point especially well. The executioners are wearing messers and the suspensions of the sword scabbards are also clearly visible. Though of very different weight, size and balance, the messers and swords have identical suspensions.
Attachment: 175.48 KB
Attachment: 170.01 KB
Attachment: 154.49 KB
Attachment: 179.18 KB
Attachment: 213.33 KB
Attachment: 171.87 KB
Attachment: 191.42 KB
Attachment: 168.47 KB
Attachment: 175.48 KB
Attachment: 170.01 KB
Attachment: 154.49 KB
Attachment: 179.18 KB
Attachment: 213.33 KB
Attachment: 171.87 KB
Attachment: 191.42 KB
Attachment: 168.47 KB
Last edited by Sean Flynt on Fri 04 Dec, 2009 1:36 pm; edited 1 time in total
One last example, of a fabric type (silk?) seen post-1500 and sometimes seen in use with the Katzbalger (notice the Katzbalger hilt directly behind the victim). Of special note is the phallic shape and position of the "buckle" knot, as well as the size of the sword this suspension carries. Hmmm...maybe I should try this with my new scabbard project. It would be a perfect match, chronologically and culturally, and I'd definitely be the only person on my block to have one. Also, I wouldn't have to make another buckle! Maybe I can find a long yellow or red scarf....:cool:
Attachment: 175.71 KB
Attachment: 175.71 KB
Those are all great pics. I always find interesting how understated (and sublimly simple) many suspensions are in comparison with the average "complicated knight sword belt" ideas that many people have. Thanks for sharing those.
What I also find interesting is variety of ways that different cultures experimented with their own suspension ideas. I am thinking in particular the different variations of the celtic La Tene period, as well as a the various nordic ideas and the middle eastern ideas of how a sword should be carried, vertical as opposed to obliquely and how they accomplished the varying angles. There was an article I read (rather poorly, as it was in French and I am limited to Spanish and English for the moment) about the different phases of the celtic sword belt. Sorry if I am rather rambling. I will try to gather my thoughts and post somthing more coherent.
What I also find interesting is variety of ways that different cultures experimented with their own suspension ideas. I am thinking in particular the different variations of the celtic La Tene period, as well as a the various nordic ideas and the middle eastern ideas of how a sword should be carried, vertical as opposed to obliquely and how they accomplished the varying angles. There was an article I read (rather poorly, as it was in French and I am limited to Spanish and English for the moment) about the different phases of the celtic sword belt. Sorry if I am rather rambling. I will try to gather my thoughts and post somthing more coherent.
Sean, thank you for posting those pictures. Some of them are of immediate use to me :)
Something that would make them (and pictures posted here in general) a lot more useful would be if they were labelled with some information as to the artist and the timeframe so people like me looking for something in a fairly specific time can follow them up. I don't know if you have that information in your library of pictures though.
I do note that most, if not all, of the swords pictured with a single knot suspension are relatively short. I wonder how well that'd work with longswords where the blade is longer than the wearer's hip-foot measurement?
Something that would make them (and pictures posted here in general) a lot more useful would be if they were labelled with some information as to the artist and the timeframe so people like me looking for something in a fairly specific time can follow them up. I don't know if you have that information in your library of pictures though.
I do note that most, if not all, of the swords pictured with a single knot suspension are relatively short. I wonder how well that'd work with longswords where the blade is longer than the wearer's hip-foot measurement?
Hello,
I don't mean to get off-topic, but would any of you mind explaining how this type of knot is tied, and how it works? Also, I'd greatly appreciate a slight bit of general historical background on it, as in, what types of swords typically utilized this type of suspension.
Thank you very much,
Brogdon
I don't mean to get off-topic, but would any of you mind explaining how this type of knot is tied, and how it works? Also, I'd greatly appreciate a slight bit of general historical background on it, as in, what types of swords typically utilized this type of suspension.
Thank you very much,
Brogdon
Michael Edelson wrote: |
Here is a 15th century scabbard/suspension I made recently:
[ Linked Image ] [ Linked Image ] |
Brogdon,
You'll find more information on the knot, including how to tie it here:
http://www.myArmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t=6361
:)
You'll find more information on the knot, including how to tie it here:
http://www.myArmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t=6361
:)
JE Sarge wrote: |
Brogdon,
You'll find more information on the knot, including how to tie it here: http://www.myArmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t=6361 :) |
Thanks, man. Much appreciated! :D
-Brogdon
Al Muckart wrote: |
Sean, thank you for posting those pictures. Some of them are of immediate use to me :)
Something that would make them (and pictures posted here in general) a lot more useful would be if they were labelled with some information as to the artist and the timeframe so people like me looking for something in a fairly specific time can follow them up. I don't know if you have that information in your library of pictures though. I do note that most, if not all, of the swords pictured with a single knot suspension are relatively short. I wonder how well that'd work with longswords where the blade is longer than the wearer's hip-foot measurement? |
It's true that the Austrians appear to have been very fond of blades of single-hand length, but with hand-and-a-half or two-hand grips, especially after ~1500 .Still, there are a number of true longswords shown above. A few of them are very helpfully held vertically so we can use biometrics to gauge length. Those come up to, or past, the figure's true waist, which is where a typical longsword hits most of us today (around 48",) with blades exceeding the foot-hip length you mention. When worn, these swords don't hang straight down, even when used with the single knot suspension. The position of the knot and the weight of the pommel keep the weapon at an appropriate angle. Also, if you look closely at the knot on my scabbard, you can see that this particular knot encourages a slight angle--the buckle end emerges from the top of the knot while the tongue end heads out from the knot at a right angle to the scabbard. All of this allows the weapon just enough of an angle to clear the ground. Of course, tightening the belt also raises the overall level of the sword--you have at least five inches to work with there, from hip to true waist.
As for details--all of these are Austrian, 1480-1525. There's too much data at IMAREAL to get it all for each image (I've collected hundreds!) but I tend save the file by the date listed in the database unless I think the period is self-evident or I don't need an exact date. If there are some in particular above that intrigue you, let me know which ones and I'll see if I have dates for them.
As far as I can tell, the IMAREAL dates are approximate in most cases (I think they refer to the first appearance of the image in historical records). The clothing, armour and arms suggest a date about as well as the actual dates do. In any case, all of the data is at IMAREAL. If you want to see swords or sword scabbards or armour or clothing or ANYTHING of, say, 1507, 1422, 1480-1490, etc., you just enter your dates, choose "material object" from the menu and proceed from there (in German). "Schwert" is a good search term to begin with. Be sure to let all of the images load before you look at any of them or you'll have to reload the huge page every time you back up.
http://www.imareal.oeaw.ac.at/realonline/
To clarify: The single-knot suspension is not the ONLY type you'll see in artwork of this culture and period. Variations of the two-point suspension are common, too.
Here's a sampling of the more complex systems from the same culture and period:
Attachment: 186.77 KB
Attachment: 170.64 KB
Attachment: 187.74 KB
Attachment: 186.77 KB
Attachment: 170.64 KB
Attachment: 187.74 KB
Thanks Sean, and thanks for the explanation of IMAREAL. I'll have more of a play with it soon.
With some luck in the next 6 months I'll be taking delivery of a longsword that I'll be building a grip covering, chappe, scabbard and suspension for. I'm planning on doing a two-point suspension after the Trinity Altarpiece and and one of the Portinari paintings by Hugo van der Goes.
The clearest place to see these is on Albion's regent and viceroy scabbards. I like them for the ability to just unhook the sword from the belt, but I can't for the life of me find anyone who manufactures the buckles and fittings to do this and having done ones for my knight scabbard I'm not real keen on doing more. That sort of metalwork isn't really my thing.
Attachment: 170 KB
Detail from Sts Margaret and Mary Magdalene with Maria Portinari
1476-79, Hugo van der Goes [ Download ]
With some luck in the next 6 months I'll be taking delivery of a longsword that I'll be building a grip covering, chappe, scabbard and suspension for. I'm planning on doing a two-point suspension after the Trinity Altarpiece and and one of the Portinari paintings by Hugo van der Goes.
The clearest place to see these is on Albion's regent and viceroy scabbards. I like them for the ability to just unhook the sword from the belt, but I can't for the life of me find anyone who manufactures the buckles and fittings to do this and having done ones for my knight scabbard I'm not real keen on doing more. That sort of metalwork isn't really my thing.
Attachment: 170 KB
Detail from Sts Margaret and Mary Magdalene with Maria Portinari
1476-79, Hugo van der Goes [ Download ]
I'm not sure exactly what that hardware would look like, but you should check Historic Enterprises and Darkwood Armory if you haven't already. Both used to sell hardware sets for 16th c. "hanger" type suspensions--4-6 buckles, the sliding buckle-and-eye for the back of the belt, strap terminal hooks, etc. The prices were very reasonable, and if you didn't need all the buckles I'm sure somebody like me would want at least one from your surplus. :D
Here's the Darkwood kit:
http://www.darkwoodarmory.com/index.php?main_...cts_id=129
Here's the Darkwood kit:
http://www.darkwoodarmory.com/index.php?main_...cts_id=129
Now I can get a better look at that painting--does that suspension include a gunslinger-style leg tie? That one's new to me, for sure. Very strange.
I don't see any hanger hardware sets at Historic Enterprises anymore, but they do have terrific 15th c. buckle and strap end sets for $25.
http://historicenterprises.biz/reenactment-go...2_184.html
http://historicenterprises.biz/reenactment-go...2_184.html
Can anybody shed light on this type? It appears to be a "quick release" system that could serve your purposes, Al. I assume a buckled strap goes through the ring, but it would have to be a very narrow strap. Maybe the ring mates with a hook. It would be pretty easy to make this part--leather strap, brass ring (check Lowes,) a couple of strips of sheet brass and two rivets. I wish the artist had shown the belt. :confused:
Attachment: 175.48 KB
Attachment: 175.48 KB
Page 1 of 2
You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum