testing

[ Linked Image ]

a sword I cannot find info on, ..I will post in another message, just checking my code.

thanks
mid-16th to early 17th cent. either Swiss, Austrian, or South German. This is in reference to the original thread, not the above saber.


Last edited by Allen W on Wed 23 Jun, 2004 3:15 pm; edited 1 time in total
Joel S. wrote:
testing

[ Linked Image ]

a sword I cannot find info on, ..I will post in another message, just checking my code.

thanks


Maybe mid-to-late 1800"s saber,(British). Any markings on the blade? Or cloe-up pic of other side of hilt.

William
aka Bill
Taken from the other side of the hilt taken from the end of the blade so that the emblem in the gaurde can be seen .
Hi there, indeed it is from the late 1800's...there is an inscription (1871) to a certain "ibotson bailey" on it....

I was told the handle is made of some sort of animal skin, alligator? snake? not sure.

I will start a new thread with this, I was just testing my bbcode above, sorry for the confusion. Don't want to mix threads.

I will post many pics like the other threads some time today.

thanks
I split these posts into their own topic. If you want, I can move this into the "testing" forum and you can start a new topic for this sword.

Cheers!
Joel S. wrote:
Hi there, indeed it is from the late 1800's...there is an inscription (1871) to a certain "ibotson bailey" on it....

I was told the handle is made of some sort of animal skin, alligator? snake? not sure.

I will start a new thread with this, I was just testing my bbcode above, sorry for the confusion. Don't want to mix threads.

I will post many pics like the other threads some time today.

thanks



The grip is made of shark or ray-skin


William
aka Bill
Can we get pics of the blade and any markings? I believe that is either a British P1822 Light Cavalry Officer's sword or a Royal Artillery Officer's sword (introduced in the 1850's). Both branches used the same pattern. The signs that indicate that it's a Royal Artillery is that the pommel is stepped and the visible tang rivet, whereas the Light Cavalry usually had checkered pommels and no tang rivet. This difference can be seen from the 1850's onwards on the swords from Wilkinson, while other manufacturers kept the stepped pommels for both service branches.

Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum




All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum