I know his armour has been talked about many times but everything I have seen is about if it is mail or some other armour type. I looked at this picture: http://www.nndb.com/people/010/000102701/odo-of-bayeux-sized.jpg and it is obvious that he has mail under this thing. You can see mail as it is depicted everywhere in the Tapestry on his head (coif) and on the lower part of his hands, so it doesn't make sense that "the thing" on the main part of the body would also be mail but differently depicted. It has to be something worn over the mail. Scale armour in combination with mail would be too heavy I suppose... So it is either some sort of much discussed padding or maybe some kind of clothes that points him out as a bishop maybe? Maybe while most man liked to wear padding under the mail, he liked to wear it over the mail? I won't enter in a discussion what material the padding is made of (if it is padding) because I think it is quite impossible to say with any certainty. Please comment. If this has already been brought out I apologize, I couldn't find anything that relates to this specific point.
It could be scale, scale and lammelar were at times worn over mail, though you don't see it very often in the west, more in Byzantium and among turkish heavy cavalry.
What I have heard most commonly is that it is either a Jazerant type armour, or padding over mail, which are both fairly similar other than one is integral.
As far as a "church heraldry" type thing - It does not look like something that would be realted to the church I do not think. Would not crosses be used?
What I have heard most commonly is that it is either a Jazerant type armour, or padding over mail, which are both fairly similar other than one is integral.
As far as a "church heraldry" type thing - It does not look like something that would be realted to the church I do not think. Would not crosses be used?
Any of the things you mentioned are likely; we know little to nothing about any of them in this time period and the artwork is not clear enough for us to say the garment is one thing or another.
If Odo is wearing a jazerant then mail would not be visible since it was sandwiched between padded fabric. The Tapestry is probably a little too early to be depicting such an armour. Nicolle reckons that Crusaders adopted it after encountering the kazaghand in the Middle East.
Gary Teuscher wrote: |
It could be scale, scale and lammelar were at times worn over mail, though you don't see it very often in the west, more in Byzantium and among turkish heavy cavalry.
What I have heard most commonly is that it is either a Jazerant type armour, or padding over mail, which are both fairly similar other than one is integral. As far as a "church heraldry" type thing - It does not look like something that would be realted to the church I do not think. Would not crosses be used? |
I agree, if it is church heraldry, there should be crosses. It was just a thought, that it would maybe make sense that it is something for esthetic, not protective role, because it would be weird that he is the only one wearing padding at all or the only one wearing it differently than others.
Either someone messed up, or it's something that the good Bishop felt he should wear to make himself stick out. It's also a way to contrast him with William.
M.
M.
Hi guys
The principle characters are named in thread on the embroidery, so I don't think this is an artistic convention to differentiate Odo . Is it not believed that the mace held by Odo, trained as a warrior, also denotes his role/rank within the clergy and the belief the a churchman should not spill blood?
Odo's helm is also different in as much as he has the 'bobble' at the peak of it.
There does appear how ever to be some attempt to convey some message by making his armour different to others in the Tapestry...what it is though we still continue to debate.
Of thread and more related to the Viking Padding perhaps is the fallen bodies been stripped of mail in the borders, if we are to believe these , then warriors where naked under the mail ;)
It can prove very difficult to read medieval iconography, especially in the case of the Tapestry where it has been reworked several times.
best
Dave
The principle characters are named in thread on the embroidery, so I don't think this is an artistic convention to differentiate Odo . Is it not believed that the mace held by Odo, trained as a warrior, also denotes his role/rank within the clergy and the belief the a churchman should not spill blood?
Odo's helm is also different in as much as he has the 'bobble' at the peak of it.
There does appear how ever to be some attempt to convey some message by making his armour different to others in the Tapestry...what it is though we still continue to debate.
Of thread and more related to the Viking Padding perhaps is the fallen bodies been stripped of mail in the borders, if we are to believe these , then warriors where naked under the mail ;)
It can prove very difficult to read medieval iconography, especially in the case of the Tapestry where it has been reworked several times.
best
Dave
David Huggins wrote: |
Is it not believed that the mace held by Odo, trained as a warrior, also denotes his role/rank within the clergy and the belief the a churchman should not spill blood? |
No. It probably does denote his rank, whether within the clergy or within the nobility in general, but the idea that clergymen weren't allowed to spill blood is a myth that has been repeatedly demolished by many different authors in many different works. Here's only one of the most accessible (though by no means the most comprehensive):
http://l-clausewitz.livejournal.com/394539.html
Quote: |
There does appear how ever to be some attempt to convey some message by making his armour different to others in the Tapestry...what it is though we still continue to debate. |
I'm in favor of the idea that it was Odo who commissioned the Tapestry, and in that case he would definitely have spent resources on making sure that his figure stood out.
Thank you Lafayette for the clarification on the mace myth. I am very familiar with belief that it was Odo who commisioned the Tapestry, it is still odd however that his 'armour' differs in it's depiction to the other Normans on the Tapestry despite all of the main players been readily identifiable to a literate viewer by their names above each of them.
If the depiction of Odo is also intended to convey his role to an illiterate viewer, they must have been perhaps familiar with him dressed in such a fashion as opposed to the usual mail hauberk. It still remains a conundrum!
best
Dave
If the depiction of Odo is also intended to convey his role to an illiterate viewer, they must have been perhaps familiar with him dressed in such a fashion as opposed to the usual mail hauberk. It still remains a conundrum!
best
Dave
Mace + Head = Blood comes out. Still unsure how anyone follows that myth anymore :/
The commissioning theory makes some sense too. Maybe he actually possessed a fairly distinctive coat, like that bible guy who was killed over it?
M.
The commissioning theory makes some sense too. Maybe he actually possessed a fairly distinctive coat, like that bible guy who was killed over it?
M.
David Huggins wrote:
Yeah, I guess one could take from the tapestry that soldiers were naked under mail, and padded gambeson type armour was worn by the Saxons!
Quote: |
Of thread and more related to the Viking Padding perhaps is the fallen bodies been stripped of mail in the borders, if we are to believe these , then warriors where naked under the mail |
Yeah, I guess one could take from the tapestry that soldiers were naked under mail, and padded gambeson type armour was worn by the Saxons!
Many agree that this is trying to depict a form of armour similiar to a coat-of-plates. We have several 11th century finds of metal triangles (and rectangles) with rivets and remanants of leather backing. The original armour would be a leather tunic with metal rectangles or triangles riveted to the outside, the end result would look just like what Bishop Odo is wearing. He is not the only one wearing some other garment there are a few other soldiers wearing similiar tunics on the same tapestry (see attachment).
As to the club, several others are using clubs aside from Bishop Odo.
Attachment: 62.53 KB
As to the club, several others are using clubs aside from Bishop Odo.
Attachment: 62.53 KB
Hadrian Coffin wrote: |
We have several 11th century finds of metal triangles (and rectangles) with rivets and remanants of leather backing. The original armour would be a leather tunic with metal rectangles or triangles riveted to the outside, the end result would look just like what Bishop Odo is wearing. |
Can you point me to some references of what you have in mind here, i'm struggling to think of anything i have come across matching this.
N.
It could be Lamellar Anna Commna mentioned that the normans would wear Lamellar
The metal rectangles were unearthed during excavation at Chateau de Blois the plate was ~6cm and dated to 9th-11th century,
Several more rectangles and triangles were found at Colletiere all with holes for rivets and some with remmanants of a leather backing, all were dated to circa 1000
Hope this helps,
Hadrian
Several more rectangles and triangles were found at Colletiere all with holes for rivets and some with remmanants of a leather backing, all were dated to circa 1000
Hope this helps,
Hadrian
Hi Hadrian
Do you a reference source for these plates? It is always possible that these plates may not be 'armour', and could be the equivalent of the archeologist much beloved 'ritual object' when ascribing a use to something they do not really know what it 's intended function was.
I think we have to be very careful when attempting to understand the Tapestry, I think mail appears to be executed by the women who sewed the 'tapestry' with varying degrees of skill and what may look like 'scale' to us may well indeed be still mail.
best
Dave
Do you a reference source for these plates? It is always possible that these plates may not be 'armour', and could be the equivalent of the archeologist much beloved 'ritual object' when ascribing a use to something they do not really know what it 's intended function was.
I think we have to be very careful when attempting to understand the Tapestry, I think mail appears to be executed by the women who sewed the 'tapestry' with varying degrees of skill and what may look like 'scale' to us may well indeed be still mail.
best
Dave
Page 1 of 1
You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum