I was wondering if there were any ideas on how to hold up my new leg armour?

http://www.wholesalearmor.com/002legs.html

is what I bought and it has buckles at the top, should I just get a belt and add leather to the bottom of the belt to hold them up or is there something better?


Thank you in advance for the help, I am new to all this.

I think leg harness typically would have been supported by points (ties) on the arming doublet. I'll bow to the armour folks here, though. I'm relatively new to that line of study.

What Sean said. For most 14th century types of harnesses, a vest-like garment called a pourpoint was worn, which allowed the weight of the legs to be spread over your hips, back and shoulders rather than only on your hips, such as this one:

http://www.revivalclothing.com/index.asp?Page...;ProdID=39

For later period harnesses, it is more typical to wear an arming doublet, which accomplishes the same thing, but is designed to accomodate other pieces of the armor, such as this:

http://www.revivalclothing.com/index.asp?Page...ProdID=221

The above link also has a brief overview of how to put on a full harness if you scan down.

If you plan on fighting in the armor, then I would say just attach it to a weight belt. The weight belt doubles as extra kidney protection so unless you want historical accuracy it is a good method.

Bill - you'll probably find that the vest-like garment is actually very much speculative and relatively ill supported (though in combination with a gambeson, it makes a very comfortable and adaptable suspension system). Most believe the under-armour garments in the late 14th and into the late 15th C were basically hose and a stout doublet or something more like a gambeson depending on the period (generally earlier).

I use a gambeson which has been custom made to suspend both my hose and leg harness. SCA rules aside, it works incredibly well. The trouble is that it has to fit very closely, something that is hard to do without getting the garment customized in some way. Basically, through the mid-section it is very snug, loosening a bit below the hips. Above the mid section can be a bit looser, though the arms are usually snug to support the arm harness.

BTW- there are other, more historical, ways around the hard kidney protection depending on your period - the Armour Archive would be a good place to check for historical and SCA compliant armour ideas.

Hehe well yes...but the historical ways generally cost a lot of money. A weight belt is 20 bucks. There is a reason why so many SCA people use the weight belt. It works (well kinda...but enough for what we do in the SCA) and is cheap. The arming vests while it costs more does make for a good system to accomidate armor. A customized gambeson is bloody expensive. And this is for a set of rather cheap munition legs...

I can see the vest...a customized gambeson...I'm seeing this is as much less of an option for your average SCA person using munition armor.

As for historic kidney protection...well by SCA rules, a lot of armor that cover that area is adequate. However some fighters who do that end up urinating blood the next day sometimes and a weight belt pretty much elimates that level of damage to your kindney (rememer the SCA uses wraps...and a lot of times, they land on your kidney)...and historical or not, why would you NOT wear one under everything for that added safe guard? I mean it can just serve as a 20 dollar don't wanna piss blood armor piece...kinda like the I don't wanna sing falsetto 10 dollar piece of plastic you wear in your pants that is also not very historical :) .

uhh.. why would you need kidney protection if you are wearing 15th century harness?

You also might consider incorporating a set of military style suspenders with any weight belt, or use the military belt. Such as these:

http://www.galaxyarmynavy.com/products.asp?cat=194

I use to have a set of munition grade generic 3/4 plate in 16g mild, and that was how I held up my legs. Very comfortable, and distributes the weight better than just a weight belt.