| Author |
Message |
Paul Hansen
|
 Posted: Tue 28 Jun, 2011 12:03 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Really nice work as always Kirk! 
|
|
  |
 |
Luka Borscak
|
| Posted: Tue 28 Jun, 2011 2:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Wow, this is perfect! Just one question though... Shouldn't the date for 13v.II be 1200-1250, not 1300-1350?
|
|
|
|
|
J.D. Crawford
|
| Posted: Tue 28 Jun, 2011 5:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Luka Borscak wrote: | | J.D. Crawford wrote: | | Thanks for the images. If I'm reading this right, he puts his type 12 pommel (similar to Oakeshott's B) from 950-1100, and type 15 (similar to Oakeshott's A) from 1050-1275. Right? That sounds right to me. |
I interpreted it as 950-1175, if the first column is 8th century, and last one is 13th century...
|
I'm still confused by European nomenclatue for centuries. Does the line marked 800 jh mean the year 800 or 700?
|
|
 |
|
Luka Borscak
|
| Posted: Tue 28 Jun, 2011 7:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
8th century is 700-799...
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Hansen
|
| Posted: Tue 28 Jun, 2011 7:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| J.D. Crawford wrote: | | I'm still confused by European nomenclature for centuries. Does the line marked 800 jh mean the year 800 or 700? |
I'm just as confused as you are, so European nomenclature can't be the problem... 
But I think he means the start of the 8th. C., so 700 A.D....
Then the type 13 variant II should be 1200-1250 A.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a standard topic