Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Edward Hitchens wrote:
Wow!! Judging by those pictures, I'd say this one's been worth the wait! I take it one of those belongs to Aaron? If I recall, he bagged Munich #1 (out of 500).

Actually, I pushed swords I have on order down the production list in favor of customer orders. (All of us here did, actually.) I think I'm #15 or 20 now. Rather see this out there in your hands...

My thought - this is a beauty - deceptively elegant - probably the most lethal piece I've handled for the 15th C longsword arts... I could comment on it's outstanding tip control, quick-quick nature, wickedly advantageous leverage, and other nice little attributes, but that'd be spoiling the fun... :p
Aaron Schnatterly wrote:
Edward Hitchens wrote:
Wow!! Judging by those pictures, I'd say this one's been worth the wait! I take it one of those belongs to Aaron? If I recall, he bagged Munich #1 (out of 500).

Actually, I pushed swords I have on order down the production list in favor of customer orders. (All of us here did, actually.) I think I'm #15 or 20 now. Rather see this out there in your hands...

My thought - this is a beauty - deceptively elegant - probably the most lethal piece I've handled for the 15th C longsword arts... I could comment on it's outstanding tip control, quick-quick nature, wickedly advantageous leverage, and other nice little attributes, but that'd be spoiling the fun... :p


Well that is impressive self-sacrifice. :cool: One consolation, I guess, is that you don't have to have your own sword to get a feel for a new model while you wait to get one for yourself.

Nice to see you post again. :D Even if you probably don't have much time to do it often.
( So, just a quick " off topic " hello. :D :cool: )
Allen Andrews wrote:
I think it would be cool to have both swords reviewed by the same hand to see how this spells out in regards to handling.


:idea: Excellent idea!! :idea:

We've had similar reviews like that such as bronze and steel versions of A&A's Edward III sword (leave it to me to bring up that sword again :cool: ). Since the Munich only just came out, I realize such a review wouldn't be for awhile. But definitely run it by Chad & Nathan! Oh, BTW, nice to hear from you Aaron!
Kudos to Albion for another drop-dead gorgeous sword and a clear demonstration of committment to all customers! I'm not sure where you folks can go from here in terms of product quality. Is there any "up" left?
Sean Flynt wrote:
Is there any "up" left?


I really love albion's product but certainly there is an "up". I believe that using actual under cording in the NG line hilts would be a great step forward and, I feel, is warranted given the gradual and significant price increase. The wire wrap on the Munich is very attractive and I would like to see some of this attention given as an option on other models- I wouuld be very willing to pay for this.

In any case- Howy and everyone at albion, though the Munich does not fall into my era of interest it really is a very beautiful and graceful sword.

Jeremy
Looks great! I can't wait for mine. The wire grip looks nice, but I can't afford it. Is there any chance of you doing this on the Fiore?
:D
Some pics of the original I made a while ago:

http://uk.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/cengelha/alb.../my_photos
Wow!

I love both versions and would have trouble deciding which way to go. That's sure one elegant and deadly design.
Hello,
I see something like a pattern on the original grip, is it leather or fabric?
Stephane Rabier wrote:
Hello,
I see something like a pattern on the original grip, is it leather or fabric?


It's tooled leather.
I've been waiting for this update for a long time. I currently have $500 credit with Albion, and in the time it's been sitting there have watched the price increase(s?) on the Regent with more than a little chagrin. But besides finances, what really held me off on finishing the purchase was this sword - I wanted to see how it would turn out.

Well, it appears to have turned out fantastic! The decision between the two models is harder than ever, and the addition of a wire grip option is a pleasant surprise to say the least. I look forward to the inevitable reviews, photos, and comparisons. Now I just need to scrounge up the balance... looks like I picked the wrong year to indulge my audiophile hobby :p.

To everyone at Albion: congrats on the sword!
-GLL
Cornelius Engelhardt wrote:
It's tooled leather.
Thanks Cornelius.

That sword is really wonderful!
That's too bad my wife won't tolerate me to buy another toy as I'm already waiting for a Czeck one and a half sword :\
Allen Andrews wrote:
I do notice that the wire wrap slightly effects the weight of the sword and the CoG, I think it would be cool to have both swords reviewed by the same hand to see how this spells out in regards to handling.

It seems to me that it would be a fairly simply matter to make the CoGs match by grinding down the annular faces of the pommel. The weights would still be slightly different as more of the wire-wrapped-grip's mass is closer to the fulcrum, but the CoG at least could be made identical. Done carefully you probably wouldn't be able to tell the difference without a micrometer.

Brian M
I have been hoping something would be added to the sales description about the origin and time period of this sword. I believe Albion attributes this as an Oakeshott type XXVIIIb, mid 15th to early 16th century. In the photos it seems to be grouped near an early rapier/ longsword with ring guard and I am thinking this may actually be appropriate.
Another pleasant surprise as of the last few minutes...
My reserve order for the plain wrap grip Munich has been completed and is now shipping!
The sword is beautiful...I really like it (make that love it).

I have a question, however...why is this particular sword so expensive? There is no hollow grinding or complex pommel that require extensive hand work...in fact from looking at it, I would say that this sword requires no more work to finish than an Agincourt or Talhoffer, and far less, for example, than the Regent or Earl. The Earl requires less than the Regent because of its simpler pommel, and so it is cheaper. Following that logic, the Munich should cost about seven to eight hundred dollars.

Is there something I'm missing from the photos?
Hey Michael!

Good that you brought this point up.

There is one important aspect that puts this sword apart from many in the NG line.
The Munich is built very close to the original sword.
The design benefits from personal researh on the original and the blade is within fractions of a milimeter of the original. Even if it does not meet the standards of the Museum Line, this sword is still benefitting from extensive and expansive research.
You get a sword that is not only a very realistic recreation of a late medieval sword, it is also a paritcularly nice example of the type.
How many swords, production or custom are based on this level of research?

It would not have been posible to make this sword unless countless of hours have gone into the analysis of the documentation material.
The only way to fund original research by making swords is to have the price reflect some of the labour and time that has gone into the development of the piece.

Simple shapes and clean lines might seem pretty straight forward but are often more demanding to produce as there is nothing to hide behind. Everything shows. No mistake can be blurred out. It is like chamber music, where each instrument is a soloist.
Just look at the narrow flat in the upper third of the midrib: it is pretty daunting to grind. You cannot slip or push it anywhere, or the whole blade might be ruined. The point on this blade is also demanding. It is narrow and quite thick: to avoid overgrinding and overheating takes awareness and care.
The S-curved guard demands a steady even motion or there will be ridges and waves in the surface, and nothing to hide them with if you are to avoid overgrinding and destruction of the shape.
Even if the details can look deceivingly simple, it is how they come together that makes or breaks the sword. Everything has to be finished just so.
I would ask you to find any other production sword built with the same level of attention to detial in all stages from original research to dedication in production.
This is what sums up to a price.

The price is higher than many other in the line, but it is really not expensive for what you get.
Hi Peter,

That makes sense. I did not realize it was that closely based on the original. Fractions of a milimeter...that's fantastic! This model sort of blurs the line between your next gen line and Museum lines, does it not?

Quote:
I would ask you to find any other production sword built with the same level of attention to detial in all stages from original research to dedication in production.


Excluding the research portion which I know little about and judging solely on the finished products, I would say it's fairly easy to find production swords that match this one. Just go to the Albion website. :)


Mike
Peter Johnsson wrote:

There is one important aspect that puts this sword apart from many in the NG line.
The Munich is built very close to the original sword. The design benefits from personal researh on the original and the blade is within fractions of a milimeter of the original. Even if it does not meet the standards of the Museum Line, this sword is still benefitting from extensive and expansive research. The price is higher than many other in the line, but it is really not expensive for what you get.


I thought pretty hard about my initial order for this sword. The guard is not my favorite "look" . But I have zero experience with them and actually expect this one to grow on me to a point where I love it. I am trying to refrain from putting any words into Peter's mouth that he never actually said. I noticed on some other older sword forums that Peter had posted on this sword in a manner that it appeared to be something of a personal favorite (my intuition, not Peter's words.) That alone would be a selling point for me (given my respect for his experience and knowledge from researching and handling a large number of actual historic swords.)

Looking closely at the point or tip of the Munich sword, that alone is much more complex than a simple awl shape or straight tapered spike. Some of the Albion models (my Sempach comes to mind) actually have a point with a phenomenal balance of structural strength (not easy to break in cutting on hard wood which I have done with the point of my Sempach) while penetrating soft targets (water filled milk jugs for example) in thrust with only "feather" weight effort. At least my particular Sempach could be a magician's prop as I can thrust it into a water filled jug and leave it there with hardly any noticeable leakage of water escaping through the cuts. This alone is a "marvel" of craftsmanship that one will not likely replicate with items priced at a much lower point, or produced by artisans lacking a sincere passion for what they are making. There is a tremendous amount of complexity involving design, final grinding and polishing labor going into achieving these traits, that probably will not be fully appreciated by anyone who has not attempted to make their own sword.
I just found this picture of the original out of its case in the photo archive! I'd never seen it not behind glass. Absolutely beautiful. And the reproduction looks like a worthy successor. :D
http://www.myArmoury.com/albums/photo/962.html
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Page 2 of 3

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum




All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum