Sean Flynt wrote: |
Could this shape be intended to maximize the offensive potential of the pommel? Every other element of this sword seems so practical that it doesn't seem logical that the pommel shape would simply be an artistic touch. With this pommel as well as the knuckle guard (which also can be used offensively at close quarters) this sword just seems to be made in anticipation of coming to grips with an opponent. |
I do not think it is far fetched to think the elongated pommel or rivet block can double as a skull crusher.
To elongate the tang beyond the pommel does has some effects on distribution of secondary or higher nodes in the grip, but I have not tested this enough to say anything conclusive about its effect in the historical material. Nor am I certain that such a thing is the primary reason, other than perhaps as a bonus effect that some cutlers in some way utilized.
The most easily reached explanation is for close quarter tactic and possible also an aesthetic effect. Aesthetic, since you do not have to make the elongation *that* long of it to be effective. A way to express and underline function in shape.