Using words used to historically describe something gives extra information. This is sometimes a desired outcome, but often the extra information implied in that description is inaccurate. If I use the word 'aketon' for a garment, people have a picture of a medieval european garment, which is not correct when using the term for a middle eastern or eastern piece.
Describing it with more abstract terms that objectively state this information will lack the context, inviting the listener to depict it with the rest of the information.
What do you think of this typology? | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total Votes : 12 |
Bram and Jason. Thanks for your replies.
Page 2 of 2
You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum