Dan Howard wrote: |
Its amazing how difficult it seems to be to simply weigh a piece of armour and record it accurately. |
But it is so much easier to weigh it while it is still on the stand!
Dan Howard wrote: |
Its amazing how difficult it seems to be to simply weigh a piece of armour and record it accurately. |
Neil Bockus wrote: |
Hello, Eric,
Yes, I do have that one listed under three-quarters armor, but thank you. It is a bit frustrating that there are a lot of armors out there that don't have their weights, heights, etc. listed, but at the same time I must say those museums that have taken the time, effort (and money!) to put out those details online have been extremely helpful. |
Neil Bockus wrote: |
Hello, Eric,
Yes, I do have that one listed under three-quarters armor, but thank you. It is a bit frustrating that there are a lot of armors out there that don't have their weights, heights, etc. listed, but at the same time I must say those museums that have taken the time, effort (and money!) to put out those details online have been extremely helpful. One book I haven't checked out yet is "The Real Fighting Stuff" by Dr. Tobias Capwell. I have the Avant armor in the lists, but no other armors from Kelvingrove since I have yet to be able to find their weights. Does anyone know if that book lists any weights of the other armors in that collection? If memory serves, there's at least two other head to toe suits in there, that, if in that book, could allow me to finish off the head-to-toe portion of the survey. V/R, Neil |